AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations

This paper discusses the ethical considerations surrounding generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in chemistry education, aiming to guide teachers toward responsible AI integration. GenAI, driven by advanced AI models like Large Language Models, has shown substantial potential in generating edu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blonder Ron, Feldman-Maggor Yael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2024-10-01
Series:Chemistry Teacher International
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2024-0014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570451204767744
author Blonder Ron
Feldman-Maggor Yael
author_facet Blonder Ron
Feldman-Maggor Yael
author_sort Blonder Ron
collection DOAJ
description This paper discusses the ethical considerations surrounding generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in chemistry education, aiming to guide teachers toward responsible AI integration. GenAI, driven by advanced AI models like Large Language Models, has shown substantial potential in generating educational content. However, this technology’s rapid rise has brought forth ethical concerns regarding general and educational use that require careful attention from educators. The UNESCO framework on GenAI in education provides a comprehensive guide to controversies around generative AI and ethical educational considerations, emphasizing human agency, inclusion, equity, and cultural diversity. Ethical issues include digital poverty, lack of national regulatory adaptation, use of content without consent, unexplainable models used to generate outputs, AI-generated content polluting the internet, lack of understanding of the real world, reducing diversity of opinions, and further marginalizing already marginalized voices and generating deep fakes. The paper delves into these eight controversies, presenting relevant examples from chemistry education to stress the need to evaluate AI-generated content critically. The paper emphasizes the importance of relating these considerations to chemistry teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and argues that responsible AI usage in education must integrate these insights to prevent the propagation of biases and inaccuracies. The conclusion stresses the necessity for comprehensive teacher training to effectively and ethically employ GenAI in educational practices.
format Article
id doaj-art-a288ed3a114642afb5924d21db77fb87
institution Kabale University
issn 2569-3263
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Chemistry Teacher International
spelling doaj-art-a288ed3a114642afb5924d21db77fb872025-02-02T15:45:10ZengDe GruyterChemistry Teacher International2569-32632024-10-016438539510.1515/cti-2024-0014AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerationsBlonder Ron0Feldman-Maggor Yael1Department of Science Teaching, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, IsraelEECS – School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Media Technology & Interaction Design, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SwedenThis paper discusses the ethical considerations surrounding generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in chemistry education, aiming to guide teachers toward responsible AI integration. GenAI, driven by advanced AI models like Large Language Models, has shown substantial potential in generating educational content. However, this technology’s rapid rise has brought forth ethical concerns regarding general and educational use that require careful attention from educators. The UNESCO framework on GenAI in education provides a comprehensive guide to controversies around generative AI and ethical educational considerations, emphasizing human agency, inclusion, equity, and cultural diversity. Ethical issues include digital poverty, lack of national regulatory adaptation, use of content without consent, unexplainable models used to generate outputs, AI-generated content polluting the internet, lack of understanding of the real world, reducing diversity of opinions, and further marginalizing already marginalized voices and generating deep fakes. The paper delves into these eight controversies, presenting relevant examples from chemistry education to stress the need to evaluate AI-generated content critically. The paper emphasizes the importance of relating these considerations to chemistry teachers’ content and pedagogical knowledge and argues that responsible AI usage in education must integrate these insights to prevent the propagation of biases and inaccuracies. The conclusion stresses the necessity for comprehensive teacher training to effectively and ethically employ GenAI in educational practices.https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2024-0014ethics in scienceartificial intelligenceweb based learningteacher educationteacher professional development
spellingShingle Blonder Ron
Feldman-Maggor Yael
AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations
Chemistry Teacher International
ethics in science
artificial intelligence
web based learning
teacher education
teacher professional development
title AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations
title_full AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations
title_fullStr AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations
title_full_unstemmed AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations
title_short AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations
title_sort ai for chemistry teaching responsible ai and ethical considerations
topic ethics in science
artificial intelligence
web based learning
teacher education
teacher professional development
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2024-0014
work_keys_str_mv AT blonderron aiforchemistryteachingresponsibleaiandethicalconsiderations
AT feldmanmaggoryael aiforchemistryteachingresponsibleaiandethicalconsiderations