THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS

The article provides a review of the ways in which interdisciplinary research in modern economic thought gives a more realistic understanding of human behavior and economic decision making. On the one hand, economic imperialism drove wider application of economics methods across social sciences and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. V. Komarovskaia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2016-02-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/494
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579433655959552
author N. V. Komarovskaia
author_facet N. V. Komarovskaia
author_sort N. V. Komarovskaia
collection DOAJ
description The article provides a review of the ways in which interdisciplinary research in modern economic thought gives a more realistic understanding of human behavior and economic decision making. On the one hand, economic imperialism drove wider application of economics methods across social sciences and brought about new interdisciplinary fields, such as law and economics, economic sociology, public choice theory, etc. On the other hand, the origin of behavioral economics, experimental economics, and neuroeconomics bridging psychology, neurobiology, and economics influences the change in the methodology used by the economics itself and fuels transformation of the model of rational economic behavior 'homo economicus', one of the central assumptions of the neoclassical economics. George Akerlof and Robert Shiller's animal spirits, prospect theory of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, research by Amartya Sen, Daniel McFadden, Vernon Smith, and other economists focusing on decision making either significantly limit, or supplement the homo economicus concept providing a deeper insight into the nature of human rationality. Behavioral economics has already become so strong as a separate discipline that it can be classified into two streams - Classical and Modern, and its main principles should be incorporated into a basic course of traditional economics. The achievements of behavioral economics yield higher quality of economic research and forecasting. Interdisciplinary approach to the human behavior studies and transformation of homo economicus offer new tools for the development policy making.
format Article
id doaj-art-a2819bddc4a348438ef930e1ca3e12a8
institution Kabale University
issn 2071-8160
2541-9099
language English
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj-art-a2819bddc4a348438ef930e1ca3e12a82025-01-30T12:16:14ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992016-02-0101(46)12914210.24833/2071-8160-2016-1-46-129-142494THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUSN. V. Komarovskaia0Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)The article provides a review of the ways in which interdisciplinary research in modern economic thought gives a more realistic understanding of human behavior and economic decision making. On the one hand, economic imperialism drove wider application of economics methods across social sciences and brought about new interdisciplinary fields, such as law and economics, economic sociology, public choice theory, etc. On the other hand, the origin of behavioral economics, experimental economics, and neuroeconomics bridging psychology, neurobiology, and economics influences the change in the methodology used by the economics itself and fuels transformation of the model of rational economic behavior 'homo economicus', one of the central assumptions of the neoclassical economics. George Akerlof and Robert Shiller's animal spirits, prospect theory of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, research by Amartya Sen, Daniel McFadden, Vernon Smith, and other economists focusing on decision making either significantly limit, or supplement the homo economicus concept providing a deeper insight into the nature of human rationality. Behavioral economics has already become so strong as a separate discipline that it can be classified into two streams - Classical and Modern, and its main principles should be incorporated into a basic course of traditional economics. The achievements of behavioral economics yield higher quality of economic research and forecasting. Interdisciplinary approach to the human behavior studies and transformation of homo economicus offer new tools for the development policy making.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/494rational economic behaviorhomo economicusgary beckereconomic imperialism amartya sengeorge akerlof and robert shiller’s theory of animal spiritsdaniel mcfaddenprospect theory of daniel kahneman and amos tverskyvernon smitheconomic decision makingbehavioral economicsexperimental economicsneuroeconomics
spellingShingle N. V. Komarovskaia
THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
rational economic behavior
homo economicus
gary becker
economic imperialism
 amartya sen
george akerlof and robert shiller’s theory of animal spirits
daniel mcfadden
prospect theory of daniel kahneman and amos tversky
vernon smith
economic decision making
behavioral economics
experimental economics
neuroeconomics
title THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
title_full THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
title_fullStr THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
title_full_unstemmed THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
title_short THE EVOLUTION OF HOMO ECONOMICUS
title_sort evolution of homo economicus
topic rational economic behavior
homo economicus
gary becker
economic imperialism
 amartya sen
george akerlof and robert shiller’s theory of animal spirits
daniel mcfadden
prospect theory of daniel kahneman and amos tversky
vernon smith
economic decision making
behavioral economics
experimental economics
neuroeconomics
url https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/494
work_keys_str_mv AT nvkomarovskaia theevolutionofhomoeconomicus
AT nvkomarovskaia evolutionofhomoeconomicus