Deconstruction of a Myth about ‘Capitaleness’: A Case of a Town Called Myshkin
Capital represents the most typical institutional body that determines the functions of a political center separating it from a “periphery” a historical memory of the previous “capitalness” has an impact on people’s identity even when a state has disappeared or is invented.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | E. S. Okuneva |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Jurist, Publishing Group
2015-10-01
|
| Series: | Сравнительная политика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.sravpol.ru/jour/article/view/349 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Town’s Symbol in the Mind of its Residents as a Determinant of a Concept of ‘Capitalness’: The Cases of Kasimov and Myshkin
by: B. A. Barabash
Published: (2015-10-01) -
The Cases of Kasimov and Myshkin: How Spatial Identity Males Some Cities More Mteropolitan than Others
by: M. I. Tislenko
Published: (2015-10-01) -
‘Capitalness’ in the Mind of the Residents of Small Russian Towns: The Cases of Kasymov, Myshking and Old Ladoga
by: A. V. Salavatova
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Postmodern Criticism: Deconstruction as a Model
by: İbrahim Alşibli
Published: (2024-10-01) -
DECONSTRUCTION IN MOVIE ENTITLED GRETEL AND HANSEL
by: Ginarsiwi Mayangseto, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)