Different Patterns of Oral Mucositis and Microbiota Injury After Total Body Irradiation- Versus Chemotherapy-Based Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Purpose: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, causing pain, infections, swallowing/speech impairment, and poor quality of life. We hypothesized that patterns (severity and dynamics) of OM and oral microbiota disruptions may be different after...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Ebadi, MD, Hakan Gem, PhD, DDS, Gale Sebastian, DDS, Rania Abasaeed, DDS, Michele Lloid, RDH, Yolanda D. Tseng, MD, Omar Y. Mian, MD, PhD, Samuel Minot, PhD, David R. Dean, DDS, Armin Rashidi, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000740
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, causing pain, infections, swallowing/speech impairment, and poor quality of life. We hypothesized that patterns (severity and dynamics) of OM and oral microbiota disruptions may be different after high-dose total body irradiation (TBI)- versus chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning. Methods and Materials: We conducted an exploratory study including comprehensive, longitudinal mucositis assessment, paired with supragingival plaque and saliva collection. OM was assessed at baseline and days +7, +14, +21, +28, and +84. Total mucositis score at each timepoint was calculated from objective findings in 2 domains and 9 oral sites using a validated scoring system. Plaque and saliva samples (baseline and days +14, +28, and +84) were profiled using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Results: A total of 249 OM assessments were performed and 342 samples were collected from 47 patients (27 chemotherapy-based, 20 TBI-based). Salivary flow rate remained stable in the chemotherapy-based cohort, but steadily declined in the TBI-based cohort, reaching a significantly lower level in the TBI-based cohort at day +84 both compared to baseline and the chemotherapy-based cohort. OM severity peaked at day +7 in the TBI-based cohort versus day +14 in the chemotherapy-based cohort. Day +14 OM was significantly more severe in the chemotherapy-based cohort; other timepoints were not different. Although the cohorts were similar in plaque microbiota composition at baseline, they became significantly different at all post- hematopoietic cell transplantation timepoints. Salivary microbiota composition was not significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Day +84 plaque microbiota diversity was significantly higher in the TBI-based cohort. Conclusions: We demonstrated different patterns of OM, microbiota injury, and salivary flow rate after TBI- versus chemotherapy-based conditioning. If validated in future studies, our findings could enhance evidence-based pretransplant counseling on oral toxicity and have implications for short- and long-term oral health in transplant survivors.
ISSN:2452-1094