A critical analysis of the management of craniofacial microsomia
Distraction osteogenesis was introduced into the management of craniofacial microsomia some decades ago. It assumed almost instant popularity without evidence of advantage. Poor long-term results and high rates of relapse prove this technique is unsuitable for all but the most carefully selected pat...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | David John David AC |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons
2018-03-01
|
| Series: | Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v1i1.63 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Structural and functional changes in the oral microbiome of patients with craniofacial microsomia
by: Tianying Zang, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
125. Addressing Facial Asymmetry and Craniofacial Microsomia For Gender-affirming Reconstruction
by: Kelly X. Huang, BS, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Characterising the speech phenotype in individuals with craniofacial microsomia: a scoping review protocol
by: Sara Kinter, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
P288: A review of phenotypic and genetic data in craniofacial microsomia cases from a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic
by: Elizabeth Sellars, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Introduction of the distance methods of genetic counseling for the parents of children with craniofacial microsomia. Determination of the frequency of inheritance of the shape of the auricle
by: O. Z. Topolnitskiy, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)