Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review

Abstract Background Molecular testing has been used for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), where the risk of malignancy is 10–40%. However, to date, the role of molecular testing in cytologically suspicious or positive for malignancy (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodule...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica Hier, Galit Avior, Marc Pusztaszeri, Joshua R. Krasner, Noura Alyouha, Veronique-Isabelle Forest, Michael P. Hier, Alex Mlynarek, Keith Richardson, Nader Sadeghi, Michael Tamilia, Richard J. Payne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00500-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561350758727680
author Jessica Hier
Galit Avior
Marc Pusztaszeri
Joshua R. Krasner
Noura Alyouha
Veronique-Isabelle Forest
Michael P. Hier
Alex Mlynarek
Keith Richardson
Nader Sadeghi
Michael Tamilia
Richard J. Payne
author_facet Jessica Hier
Galit Avior
Marc Pusztaszeri
Joshua R. Krasner
Noura Alyouha
Veronique-Isabelle Forest
Michael P. Hier
Alex Mlynarek
Keith Richardson
Nader Sadeghi
Michael Tamilia
Richard J. Payne
author_sort Jessica Hier
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Molecular testing has been used for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), where the risk of malignancy is 10–40%. However, to date, the role of molecular testing in cytologically suspicious or positive for malignancy (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules has been controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients who had molecular testing in Bethesda V and VI thyroid nodules had the optimal extent of surgery performed more often than patients who did not have molecular testing performed. Methods A retrospective chart review of 122 cases was performed: 101 patients from the McGill University teaching hospitals and 21 patients from the Hillel Yaffe Medical center, Technion University. Patients included in the study were those with Bethesda V or VI thyroid nodules who underwent molecular testing (ThyGenext® or ThyroseqV3®) (McGill n = 72, Hillel Yaffe n = 14). Patients with Bethesda V or VI thyroid nodules who did not undergo molecular testing were used as controls (McGill n = 29, Hillel Yaffe n = 7). Each case was reviewed in order to determine whether the patient had optimal surgery. This was defined as total thyroidectomy in the presence of either a positive lymph node, extrathyroidal extension, or an aggressive pathological variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (tall cell, hobnail, columnar cell, diffuse sclerosing, and solid/trabecular) documented on the final pathology report. In all other cases, a lobectomy/hemi/subtotal thyroidectomy was considered as optimal surgery. Chi-squared testing was performed to compare groups. Results When molecular testing was done, 91.86% (79/86) of surgeries in the molecular testing group were optimal, compared to 61.11% (22/36) in the control group. At McGill University teaching hospitals and at Hillel Yaffe, 91.67% (66/72) and 92.86% (13/14) of surgeries in the intervention group were considered as optimal, respectively. This compares to 58.62% (17/29) at McGill and 71.43% (5/7) at Hillel Yaffe when molecular testing was not performed (p = .001, p = .186). Conclusions In this study, molecular testing in Bethesda V and VI thyroid tumors significantly improved the likelihood of optimal surgery. Therefore, molecular testing may have an important role in optimizing surgical procedures performed in the setting of Bethesda V and VI thyroid nodules. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to further investigate this finding. Graphical abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-a205c7ab5a20401a9143d9457fdfdf77
institution Kabale University
issn 1916-0216
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj-art-a205c7ab5a20401a9143d9457fdfdf772025-01-03T01:45:57ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162021-04-015011710.1186/s40463-021-00500-6Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart reviewJessica Hier0Galit Avior1Marc Pusztaszeri2Joshua R. Krasner3Noura Alyouha4Veronique-Isabelle Forest5Michael P. Hier6Alex Mlynarek7Keith Richardson8Nader Sadeghi9Michael Tamilia10Richard J. Payne11Faculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre, Technion UniversityDepartment of Pathology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityFaculty of PharmacologyDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, McGill UniversityDivision of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Sir Mortimer B. David-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, McGill UniversityAbstract Background Molecular testing has been used for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda III and IV), where the risk of malignancy is 10–40%. However, to date, the role of molecular testing in cytologically suspicious or positive for malignancy (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules has been controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients who had molecular testing in Bethesda V and VI thyroid nodules had the optimal extent of surgery performed more often than patients who did not have molecular testing performed. Methods A retrospective chart review of 122 cases was performed: 101 patients from the McGill University teaching hospitals and 21 patients from the Hillel Yaffe Medical center, Technion University. Patients included in the study were those with Bethesda V or VI thyroid nodules who underwent molecular testing (ThyGenext® or ThyroseqV3®) (McGill n = 72, Hillel Yaffe n = 14). Patients with Bethesda V or VI thyroid nodules who did not undergo molecular testing were used as controls (McGill n = 29, Hillel Yaffe n = 7). Each case was reviewed in order to determine whether the patient had optimal surgery. This was defined as total thyroidectomy in the presence of either a positive lymph node, extrathyroidal extension, or an aggressive pathological variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (tall cell, hobnail, columnar cell, diffuse sclerosing, and solid/trabecular) documented on the final pathology report. In all other cases, a lobectomy/hemi/subtotal thyroidectomy was considered as optimal surgery. Chi-squared testing was performed to compare groups. Results When molecular testing was done, 91.86% (79/86) of surgeries in the molecular testing group were optimal, compared to 61.11% (22/36) in the control group. At McGill University teaching hospitals and at Hillel Yaffe, 91.67% (66/72) and 92.86% (13/14) of surgeries in the intervention group were considered as optimal, respectively. This compares to 58.62% (17/29) at McGill and 71.43% (5/7) at Hillel Yaffe when molecular testing was not performed (p = .001, p = .186). Conclusions In this study, molecular testing in Bethesda V and VI thyroid tumors significantly improved the likelihood of optimal surgery. Therefore, molecular testing may have an important role in optimizing surgical procedures performed in the setting of Bethesda V and VI thyroid nodules. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to further investigate this finding. Graphical abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00500-6
spellingShingle Jessica Hier
Galit Avior
Marc Pusztaszeri
Joshua R. Krasner
Noura Alyouha
Veronique-Isabelle Forest
Michael P. Hier
Alex Mlynarek
Keith Richardson
Nader Sadeghi
Michael Tamilia
Richard J. Payne
Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
title Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review
title_full Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review
title_fullStr Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review
title_full_unstemmed Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review
title_short Molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant (Bethesda V and VI) thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention: a retrospective chart review
title_sort molecular testing for cytologically suspicious and malignant bethesda v and vi thyroid nodules to optimize the extent of surgical intervention a retrospective chart review
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00500-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicahier moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT galitavior moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT marcpusztaszeri moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT joshuarkrasner moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT nouraalyouha moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT veroniqueisabelleforest moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT michaelphier moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT alexmlynarek moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT keithrichardson moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT nadersadeghi moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT michaeltamilia moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview
AT richardjpayne moleculartestingforcytologicallysuspiciousandmalignantbethesdavandvithyroidnodulestooptimizetheextentofsurgicalinterventionaretrospectivechartreview