The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States

Abstract Liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the United States have risen dramatically since the LNG‐export ban was lifted in 2016, and the United States is now the world's largest exporter. This LNG is produced largely from shale gas. Production of shale gas, as well as liquefaction to ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert W. Howarth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-11-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1934
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850075456915636224
author Robert W. Howarth
author_facet Robert W. Howarth
author_sort Robert W. Howarth
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the United States have risen dramatically since the LNG‐export ban was lifted in 2016, and the United States is now the world's largest exporter. This LNG is produced largely from shale gas. Production of shale gas, as well as liquefaction to make LNG and LNG transport by tanker, is energy‐intensive, which contributes significantly to the LNG greenhouse gas footprint. The production and transport of shale gas emits a substantial amount of methane as well, and liquefaction and tanker transport of LNG can further increase methane emissions. Consequently, carbon dioxide (CO2) from end‐use combustion of LNG contributes only 34% of the total LNG greenhouse gas footprint, when CO2 and methane are compared over 20 years global warming potential (GWP20) following emission. Upstream and midstream methane emissions are the largest contributors to the LNG footprint (38% of total LNG emissions, based on GWP20). Adding CO2 emissions from the energy used to produce LNG, total upstream and midstream emissions make up on average 47% of the total greenhouse gas footprint of LNG. Other significant emissions are the liquefaction process (8.8% of the total, on average, using GWP20) and tanker transport (5.5% of the total, on average, using GWP20). Emissions from tankers vary from 3.9% to 8.1% depending upon the type of tanker. Surprisingly, the most modern tankers propelled by two‐ and four‐stroke engines have higher total greenhouse gas emissions than steam‐powered tankers, despite their greater fuel efficiency and lower CO2 emissions, due to methane slippage in their exhaust. Overall, the greenhouse gas footprint for LNG as a fuel source is 33% greater than that for coal when analyzed using GWP20 (160 g CO2‐equivalent/MJ vs. 120 g CO2‐equivalent/MJ). Even considered on the time frame of 100 years after emission (GWP100), which severely understates the climatic damage of methane, the LNG footprint equals or exceeds that of coal.
format Article
id doaj-art-a1e56fe76924448fa464de29d4bb498d
institution DOAJ
issn 2050-0505
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Energy Science & Engineering
spelling doaj-art-a1e56fe76924448fa464de29d4bb498d2025-08-20T02:46:18ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052024-11-0112114843485910.1002/ese3.1934The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United StatesRobert W. Howarth0Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Cornell University Ithaca New York USAAbstract Liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from the United States have risen dramatically since the LNG‐export ban was lifted in 2016, and the United States is now the world's largest exporter. This LNG is produced largely from shale gas. Production of shale gas, as well as liquefaction to make LNG and LNG transport by tanker, is energy‐intensive, which contributes significantly to the LNG greenhouse gas footprint. The production and transport of shale gas emits a substantial amount of methane as well, and liquefaction and tanker transport of LNG can further increase methane emissions. Consequently, carbon dioxide (CO2) from end‐use combustion of LNG contributes only 34% of the total LNG greenhouse gas footprint, when CO2 and methane are compared over 20 years global warming potential (GWP20) following emission. Upstream and midstream methane emissions are the largest contributors to the LNG footprint (38% of total LNG emissions, based on GWP20). Adding CO2 emissions from the energy used to produce LNG, total upstream and midstream emissions make up on average 47% of the total greenhouse gas footprint of LNG. Other significant emissions are the liquefaction process (8.8% of the total, on average, using GWP20) and tanker transport (5.5% of the total, on average, using GWP20). Emissions from tankers vary from 3.9% to 8.1% depending upon the type of tanker. Surprisingly, the most modern tankers propelled by two‐ and four‐stroke engines have higher total greenhouse gas emissions than steam‐powered tankers, despite their greater fuel efficiency and lower CO2 emissions, due to methane slippage in their exhaust. Overall, the greenhouse gas footprint for LNG as a fuel source is 33% greater than that for coal when analyzed using GWP20 (160 g CO2‐equivalent/MJ vs. 120 g CO2‐equivalent/MJ). Even considered on the time frame of 100 years after emission (GWP100), which severely understates the climatic damage of methane, the LNG footprint equals or exceeds that of coal.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1934global warming potentialGWP20lifecycle analysisLNGmethane emissions
spellingShingle Robert W. Howarth
The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States
Energy Science & Engineering
global warming potential
GWP20
lifecycle analysis
LNG
methane emissions
title The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States
title_full The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States
title_fullStr The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States
title_full_unstemmed The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States
title_short The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States
title_sort greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas lng exported from the united states
topic global warming potential
GWP20
lifecycle analysis
LNG
methane emissions
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1934
work_keys_str_mv AT robertwhowarth thegreenhousegasfootprintofliquefiednaturalgaslngexportedfromtheunitedstates
AT robertwhowarth greenhousegasfootprintofliquefiednaturalgaslngexportedfromtheunitedstates