The fundamental frequencies of our own voice

Own actions send a corollary discharge (CD) signal, that is a copy of the planned motor programme, to sensory-specific brain areas to suppress the anticipated sensory response, providing a neural basis for the sense of self. When we speak, the sensory consequences of the fundamental frequency ([Form...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hakam Neamaalkassis, Yves Boubenec, Christian Fiebach, R. Muralikrishnan, Alessandro Tavano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2025-02-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849773297018863616
author Hakam Neamaalkassis
Yves Boubenec
Christian Fiebach
R. Muralikrishnan
Alessandro Tavano
author_facet Hakam Neamaalkassis
Yves Boubenec
Christian Fiebach
R. Muralikrishnan
Alessandro Tavano
author_sort Hakam Neamaalkassis
collection DOAJ
description Own actions send a corollary discharge (CD) signal, that is a copy of the planned motor programme, to sensory-specific brain areas to suppress the anticipated sensory response, providing a neural basis for the sense of self. When we speak, the sensory consequences of the fundamental frequency ([Formula: see text]) of our own voice, generated by vocal fold vibrations, are suppressed. However, due to bone/air conduction filtering effects, the [Formula: see text] we self-generate is measurably different from the [Formula: see text] we subjectively perceive as defining our own voice. Using an auditory change deafness paradigm, we parametrically tested the sensitivity to auditory change in the frequency neighbourhoods of objective and subjective own voice pitches and found that participants experience change deafness for both to a similar extent, relative to a control pitch condition. We conclude that when we listen attentively, we are likely to filter out small pitch changes in the vicinity of our own objective and subjective voice [Formula: see text], possibly as a long-term consequence of speaking-induced suppression mechanisms integrated with individual, perceptual bodily priors.
format Article
id doaj-art-a1a94258e09a4e76a1218228f2bae798
institution DOAJ
issn 2054-5703
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher The Royal Society
record_format Article
series Royal Society Open Science
spelling doaj-art-a1a94258e09a4e76a1218228f2bae7982025-08-20T03:02:06ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032025-02-0112210.1098/rsos.241081The fundamental frequencies of our own voiceHakam Neamaalkassis0Yves Boubenec1Christian Fiebach2R. Muralikrishnan3Alessandro Tavano4Department of Cognitive Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, Frankfurt a. M. 63122, GermanyDépartement d’Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, 29 rue d’Ulm, Paris 75005, FranceDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 1, Frankfurt a. M. 60323, GermanyDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, Frankfurt a. M. 63122, GermanyDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, Frankfurt a. M. 63122, GermanyOwn actions send a corollary discharge (CD) signal, that is a copy of the planned motor programme, to sensory-specific brain areas to suppress the anticipated sensory response, providing a neural basis for the sense of self. When we speak, the sensory consequences of the fundamental frequency ([Formula: see text]) of our own voice, generated by vocal fold vibrations, are suppressed. However, due to bone/air conduction filtering effects, the [Formula: see text] we self-generate is measurably different from the [Formula: see text] we subjectively perceive as defining our own voice. Using an auditory change deafness paradigm, we parametrically tested the sensitivity to auditory change in the frequency neighbourhoods of objective and subjective own voice pitches and found that participants experience change deafness for both to a similar extent, relative to a control pitch condition. We conclude that when we listen attentively, we are likely to filter out small pitch changes in the vicinity of our own objective and subjective voice [Formula: see text], possibly as a long-term consequence of speaking-induced suppression mechanisms integrated with individual, perceptual bodily priors.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241081change deafnessauditory attentionattentive filterscorollary dischargesubjective perceptionself-generation
spellingShingle Hakam Neamaalkassis
Yves Boubenec
Christian Fiebach
R. Muralikrishnan
Alessandro Tavano
The fundamental frequencies of our own voice
Royal Society Open Science
change deafness
auditory attention
attentive filters
corollary discharge
subjective perception
self-generation
title The fundamental frequencies of our own voice
title_full The fundamental frequencies of our own voice
title_fullStr The fundamental frequencies of our own voice
title_full_unstemmed The fundamental frequencies of our own voice
title_short The fundamental frequencies of our own voice
title_sort fundamental frequencies of our own voice
topic change deafness
auditory attention
attentive filters
corollary discharge
subjective perception
self-generation
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241081
work_keys_str_mv AT hakamneamaalkassis thefundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT yvesboubenec thefundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT christianfiebach thefundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT rmuralikrishnan thefundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT alessandrotavano thefundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT hakamneamaalkassis fundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT yvesboubenec fundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT christianfiebach fundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT rmuralikrishnan fundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice
AT alessandrotavano fundamentalfrequenciesofourownvoice