The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors”
The article contains a critical analysis of the opinion prevailing in russian historiography that the metropolitan of All Russia Joasaph (Skripitsyn), unlike his predecessor Daniil, was a supporter of the so-called «non-possessors» - representatives of russian monasticism who called for renouncement...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
St. Tikhon's Orthodox University
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия ИИ. История, история Русской Православной Церкви |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/8203 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849398507161518080 |
|---|---|
| author | Vladislav Petrushko |
| author_facet | Vladislav Petrushko |
| author_sort | Vladislav Petrushko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The article contains a critical analysis of the opinion prevailing in russian historiography that the metropolitan of All Russia Joasaph (Skripitsyn), unlike his predecessor Daniil, was a supporter of the so-called «non-possessors» - representatives of russian monasticism who called for renouncement of monasteries from land estates. Based on the sources cited in the article, the author comes to the conclusion that the opinion that metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) belongs to the «non-possessors» should be recognized as unfounded. It seems that in the context of modern ideas about the controversy between "Josephites" and "non-possessors" it would be generally incorrect to raise the question of the "non-possessiveness" of Ioasaph (Skripitsyn). Russian monasticism in the second quarter of the 16th century. was not totally divided on the issue of attitude to the monastic lands into two irreconcilable camps. The presence in his midst of groups of "Josephites" and "nonpossessors" who occupied extreme positions on the issue of church land ownership does not mean that all the rest certainly had to decide on such a "party" affiliation. Joasaph (Skripitsyn), unlike Metropolitan Daniel and Vassian (Patrikeev), most likely was alien to such a biased view of both the problem of monastic lands and monasticism in general. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a19b422efe5a4bb8b6a25acd2bf2053d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1991-6434 2409-4811 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | St. Tikhon's Orthodox University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия ИИ. История, история Русской Православной Церкви |
| spelling | doaj-art-a19b422efe5a4bb8b6a25acd2bf2053d2025-08-20T03:38:35ZrusSt. Tikhon's Orthodox UniversityВестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия ИИ. История, история Русской Православной Церкви1991-64342409-48112023-12-011141142634http://dx.doi.org/10.15382/sturII2023114.26-345The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors”Vladislav PetrushkoThe article contains a critical analysis of the opinion prevailing in russian historiography that the metropolitan of All Russia Joasaph (Skripitsyn), unlike his predecessor Daniil, was a supporter of the so-called «non-possessors» - representatives of russian monasticism who called for renouncement of monasteries from land estates. Based on the sources cited in the article, the author comes to the conclusion that the opinion that metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) belongs to the «non-possessors» should be recognized as unfounded. It seems that in the context of modern ideas about the controversy between "Josephites" and "non-possessors" it would be generally incorrect to raise the question of the "non-possessiveness" of Ioasaph (Skripitsyn). Russian monasticism in the second quarter of the 16th century. was not totally divided on the issue of attitude to the monastic lands into two irreconcilable camps. The presence in his midst of groups of "Josephites" and "nonpossessors" who occupied extreme positions on the issue of church land ownership does not mean that all the rest certainly had to decide on such a "party" affiliation. Joasaph (Skripitsyn), unlike Metropolitan Daniel and Vassian (Patrikeev), most likely was alien to such a biased view of both the problem of monastic lands and monasticism in general.https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/8203orthodoxy russian church metropolitan monasticism «non-possessors» «josephites»православие русская церковь митрополит монашество «нестяжатели» «иосифляне» |
| spellingShingle | Vladislav Petrushko The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors” Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета: Серия ИИ. История, история Русской Православной Церкви orthodoxy russian church metropolitan monasticism «non-possessors» «josephites» православие русская церковь митрополит монашество «нестяжатели» «иосифляне» |
| title | The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors” |
| title_full | The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors” |
| title_fullStr | The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors” |
| title_full_unstemmed | The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors” |
| title_short | The issue of belonging of metropolitan Joasaph (Skripitsyn) to the circle of “non-possessors” |
| title_sort | issue of belonging of metropolitan joasaph skripitsyn to the circle of non possessors |
| topic | orthodoxy russian church metropolitan monasticism «non-possessors» «josephites» православие русская церковь митрополит монашество «нестяжатели» «иосифляне» |
| url | https://periodical.pstgu.ru/ru/pdf/article/8203 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vladislavpetrushko theissueofbelongingofmetropolitanjoasaphskripitsyntothecircleofnonpossessors AT vladislavpetrushko issueofbelongingofmetropolitanjoasaphskripitsyntothecircleofnonpossessors |