One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study

Objective. This research demonstrates that interoceptive attentiveness (IA) can modulate cortical oscillations related to the emotional and cognitive representations of observing pain in others. Methods. Twenty participants were required to observe painful/nonpainful stimuli in an individual versus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michela Balconi, Laura Angioletti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5585060
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849398364930572288
author Michela Balconi
Laura Angioletti
author_facet Michela Balconi
Laura Angioletti
author_sort Michela Balconi
collection DOAJ
description Objective. This research demonstrates that interoceptive attentiveness (IA) can modulate cortical oscillations related to the emotional and cognitive representations of observing pain in others. Methods. Twenty participants were required to observe painful/nonpainful stimuli in an individual versus the interactive condition during the recording of the electroencephalogram. The sample was divided into experimental (EXP) and control (CTR) groups, and the EXP group was explicitly required to direct the attention on its interoceptive correlates while observing the stimuli. Results. Mixed repeated measures, analyses of variance, were applied to each EEG frequency band. Significant findings were obtained mainly for theta and beta bands for the two groups. A hemispheric lateralisation effect was found, with right lateralisation of the theta band for the EXP group when observing painful stimuli and enhanced left activation of theta and beta bands for the CTR group when observing nonpainful stimuli. For both groups, frontal cortical regions were significantly sensitive to social scenarios, while posterior parietal activation was found for stimuli depicting the individual condition. Conclusions. The results suggest that IA might enhance the emotional representation of painful stimuli, highlighting their negative and unpleasant features in the EXP group, while the attention of the CTR group was mainly drawn to nonpainful stimuli in social and individual conditions, with a positive valence. The role of frontal regions in the processing of social stimuli through social cognition, inducing emotional mirroring and requiring deeper analysis of the social context, was underlined. We propose that IA could be trained for promoting emotion regulation and empathic response.
format Article
id doaj-art-a17eabbbd162439cbbcb8a6640f78d00
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-a17eabbbd162439cbbcb8a6640f78d002025-08-20T03:38:38ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/55850605585060One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG StudyMichela Balconi0Laura Angioletti1International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, ItalyInternational Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, ItalyObjective. This research demonstrates that interoceptive attentiveness (IA) can modulate cortical oscillations related to the emotional and cognitive representations of observing pain in others. Methods. Twenty participants were required to observe painful/nonpainful stimuli in an individual versus the interactive condition during the recording of the electroencephalogram. The sample was divided into experimental (EXP) and control (CTR) groups, and the EXP group was explicitly required to direct the attention on its interoceptive correlates while observing the stimuli. Results. Mixed repeated measures, analyses of variance, were applied to each EEG frequency band. Significant findings were obtained mainly for theta and beta bands for the two groups. A hemispheric lateralisation effect was found, with right lateralisation of the theta band for the EXP group when observing painful stimuli and enhanced left activation of theta and beta bands for the CTR group when observing nonpainful stimuli. For both groups, frontal cortical regions were significantly sensitive to social scenarios, while posterior parietal activation was found for stimuli depicting the individual condition. Conclusions. The results suggest that IA might enhance the emotional representation of painful stimuli, highlighting their negative and unpleasant features in the EXP group, while the attention of the CTR group was mainly drawn to nonpainful stimuli in social and individual conditions, with a positive valence. The role of frontal regions in the processing of social stimuli through social cognition, inducing emotional mirroring and requiring deeper analysis of the social context, was underlined. We propose that IA could be trained for promoting emotion regulation and empathic response.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5585060
spellingShingle Michela Balconi
Laura Angioletti
One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study
Pain Research and Management
title One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study
title_full One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study
title_fullStr One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study
title_full_unstemmed One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study
title_short One’s Interoception Affects the Representation of Seeing Others’ Pain: A Randomized Controlled qEEG Study
title_sort one s interoception affects the representation of seeing others pain a randomized controlled qeeg study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5585060
work_keys_str_mv AT michelabalconi onesinteroceptionaffectstherepresentationofseeingotherspainarandomizedcontrolledqeegstudy
AT lauraangioletti onesinteroceptionaffectstherepresentationofseeingotherspainarandomizedcontrolledqeegstudy