Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
The process of peer review for submissions to scientific journals is a well-established and widely used procedure. Review by one's peers is a well-recognised and long-standing method of appraisal. Throughout all branches of science, medicine, humanities, art, literature, politics, sport, and in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Richard J.C. Brown |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2006-01-01
|
| Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.228 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Anonymity in anonymized peer review is incompatible with preprints
by: Jaime Teixeira da Silva
Published: (2022-10-01) -
The Role of the Anonymous Voice in Post-Publication Peer Review Versus Traditional Peer Review
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
A randomized controlled trial on anonymizing reviewers to each other in peer review discussions.
by: Charvi Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Online trace anonymization based on anonymous flow table
by: Chun-jing HAN, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Altaholics Anonymous
by: Paul Manning
Published: (2013-03-01)