Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.

Organisms maintain competitive fitness in the face of environmental challenges through molecular evolution. However, it remains largely unknown how different biophysical factors constrain molecular evolution in a given environment. Here, using deep mutational scanning, we quantified empirical fitnes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rohan Dandage, Rajesh Pandey, Gopal Jayaraj, Manish Rai, David Berger, Kausik Chakraborty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-05-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007419&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849722145522843648
author Rohan Dandage
Rajesh Pandey
Gopal Jayaraj
Manish Rai
David Berger
Kausik Chakraborty
author_facet Rohan Dandage
Rajesh Pandey
Gopal Jayaraj
Manish Rai
David Berger
Kausik Chakraborty
author_sort Rohan Dandage
collection DOAJ
description Organisms maintain competitive fitness in the face of environmental challenges through molecular evolution. However, it remains largely unknown how different biophysical factors constrain molecular evolution in a given environment. Here, using deep mutational scanning, we quantified empirical fitness of >2000 single site mutants of the Gentamicin-resistant gene (GmR) in Escherichia coli, in a representative set of physical (non-native temperatures) and chemical (small molecule supplements) environments. From this, we could infer how different biophysical parameters of the mutations constrain molecular function in different environments. We find ligand binding, and protein stability to be the best predictors of mutants' fitness, but their relative predictive power differs across environments. While protein folding emerges as the strongest predictor at minimal antibiotic concentration, ligand binding becomes a stronger predictor of mutant fitness at higher concentration. Remarkably, strengths of environment-specific selection pressures were largely predictable from the degree of mutational perturbation of protein folding and ligand binding. By identifying structural constraints that act as determinants of fitness, our study thus provides coarse mechanistic insights into the environment specific accessibility of mutational fates.
format Article
id doaj-art-a166389ff8e34ee189cc556c00705fd6
institution DOAJ
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
language English
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Genetics
spelling doaj-art-a166389ff8e34ee189cc556c00705fd62025-08-20T03:11:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042018-05-01145e100741910.1371/journal.pgen.1007419Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.Rohan DandageRajesh PandeyGopal JayarajManish RaiDavid BergerKausik ChakrabortyOrganisms maintain competitive fitness in the face of environmental challenges through molecular evolution. However, it remains largely unknown how different biophysical factors constrain molecular evolution in a given environment. Here, using deep mutational scanning, we quantified empirical fitness of >2000 single site mutants of the Gentamicin-resistant gene (GmR) in Escherichia coli, in a representative set of physical (non-native temperatures) and chemical (small molecule supplements) environments. From this, we could infer how different biophysical parameters of the mutations constrain molecular function in different environments. We find ligand binding, and protein stability to be the best predictors of mutants' fitness, but their relative predictive power differs across environments. While protein folding emerges as the strongest predictor at minimal antibiotic concentration, ligand binding becomes a stronger predictor of mutant fitness at higher concentration. Remarkably, strengths of environment-specific selection pressures were largely predictable from the degree of mutational perturbation of protein folding and ligand binding. By identifying structural constraints that act as determinants of fitness, our study thus provides coarse mechanistic insights into the environment specific accessibility of mutational fates.https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007419&type=printable
spellingShingle Rohan Dandage
Rajesh Pandey
Gopal Jayaraj
Manish Rai
David Berger
Kausik Chakraborty
Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.
PLoS Genetics
title Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.
title_full Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.
title_fullStr Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.
title_full_unstemmed Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.
title_short Differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates.
title_sort differential strengths of molecular determinants guide environment specific mutational fates
url https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1007419&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT rohandandage differentialstrengthsofmoleculardeterminantsguideenvironmentspecificmutationalfates
AT rajeshpandey differentialstrengthsofmoleculardeterminantsguideenvironmentspecificmutationalfates
AT gopaljayaraj differentialstrengthsofmoleculardeterminantsguideenvironmentspecificmutationalfates
AT manishrai differentialstrengthsofmoleculardeterminantsguideenvironmentspecificmutationalfates
AT davidberger differentialstrengthsofmoleculardeterminantsguideenvironmentspecificmutationalfates
AT kausikchakraborty differentialstrengthsofmoleculardeterminantsguideenvironmentspecificmutationalfates