Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series

Abstract Objectives To report intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of posterior approach Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) patients and analyse a single‐surgeon learning curve. Patients & Methods The initial 150 patients undergoing posterior approach RARP by a single surge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li June Tay, Henry Y. C. Pan, Leigh James Spurling, Philip Dundee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70058
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849412254705909760
author Li June Tay
Henry Y. C. Pan
Leigh James Spurling
Philip Dundee
author_facet Li June Tay
Henry Y. C. Pan
Leigh James Spurling
Philip Dundee
author_sort Li June Tay
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives To report intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of posterior approach Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) patients and analyse a single‐surgeon learning curve. Patients & Methods The initial 150 patients undergoing posterior approach RARP by a single surgeon were analysed in three equal cohorts. Initial postoperative follow‐up was for a minimum of 3 months. Results A total of 150 patients were included. These cases were performed between April 2017 to June 2024. There was no significant difference in pre‐operative patient age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), body mass index (BMI), prostate volume, number of biopsy positive cores, International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade group and clinical T‐stage. Intraoperative differences between cohorts were decreasing total operative time (153 min vs 121 min vs 106 min, p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (296 ml vs 205 ml vs 199 ml, p < 0.001), but no difference in nerve sparing status (p = 0.243). Postoperatively, no difference was found in median length of stay, ISUP grade group, tumour volume, 30‐day readmissions or complications. There were significant differences in overall pathological T stage (p = 0.004) between the cohorts, but not positive margin status, even with T2/T3 disease. There was a significant difference in early continence recovery within the first week (p = 0.022) and at 1 month (0.041) but no difference between overall continence recovery and erectile function recovery. Conclusions Estimated blood loss and total operative time decreased across the cohorts, despite worsening disease burden. Oncological and functional outcomes are excellent throughout when compared with published literature. The learning curve may be facilitated initially by careful patient selection. Posterior approach RARP could be safely adopted by urologists adept in standard RARP, and structured training may improve the uptake of this technique.
format Article
id doaj-art-a15e6dc415f149eaa22f37b3c24a303c
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-a15e6dc415f149eaa22f37b3c24a303c2025-08-20T03:34:29ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262025-07-0167n/an/a10.1002/bco2.70058Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon seriesLi June Tay0Henry Y. C. Pan1Leigh James Spurling2Philip Dundee3Department of Urology East Kent Hospital NHS Trust Canterbury UKDepartment of Urology The Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria AustraliaDepartment of Targeted Intervention University College London London UKDepartment of Urology The Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria AustraliaAbstract Objectives To report intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of posterior approach Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) patients and analyse a single‐surgeon learning curve. Patients & Methods The initial 150 patients undergoing posterior approach RARP by a single surgeon were analysed in three equal cohorts. Initial postoperative follow‐up was for a minimum of 3 months. Results A total of 150 patients were included. These cases were performed between April 2017 to June 2024. There was no significant difference in pre‐operative patient age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), body mass index (BMI), prostate volume, number of biopsy positive cores, International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade group and clinical T‐stage. Intraoperative differences between cohorts were decreasing total operative time (153 min vs 121 min vs 106 min, p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (296 ml vs 205 ml vs 199 ml, p < 0.001), but no difference in nerve sparing status (p = 0.243). Postoperatively, no difference was found in median length of stay, ISUP grade group, tumour volume, 30‐day readmissions or complications. There were significant differences in overall pathological T stage (p = 0.004) between the cohorts, but not positive margin status, even with T2/T3 disease. There was a significant difference in early continence recovery within the first week (p = 0.022) and at 1 month (0.041) but no difference between overall continence recovery and erectile function recovery. Conclusions Estimated blood loss and total operative time decreased across the cohorts, despite worsening disease burden. Oncological and functional outcomes are excellent throughout when compared with published literature. The learning curve may be facilitated initially by careful patient selection. Posterior approach RARP could be safely adopted by urologists adept in standard RARP, and structured training may improve the uptake of this technique.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70058learning curveoutcomesprostate cancerprostatectomyRetzius sparingrobotics
spellingShingle Li June Tay
Henry Y. C. Pan
Leigh James Spurling
Philip Dundee
Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series
BJUI Compass
learning curve
outcomes
prostate cancer
prostatectomy
Retzius sparing
robotics
title Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series
title_full Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series
title_short Comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve: A single‐surgeon series
title_sort comparative analysis of early outcomes of the first 150 cases of posterior approach robotic assisted radical prostatectomy and identification of the learning curve a single surgeon series
topic learning curve
outcomes
prostate cancer
prostatectomy
Retzius sparing
robotics
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70058
work_keys_str_mv AT lijunetay comparativeanalysisofearlyoutcomesofthefirst150casesofposteriorapproachroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyandidentificationofthelearningcurveasinglesurgeonseries
AT henryycpan comparativeanalysisofearlyoutcomesofthefirst150casesofposteriorapproachroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyandidentificationofthelearningcurveasinglesurgeonseries
AT leighjamesspurling comparativeanalysisofearlyoutcomesofthefirst150casesofposteriorapproachroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyandidentificationofthelearningcurveasinglesurgeonseries
AT philipdundee comparativeanalysisofearlyoutcomesofthefirst150casesofposteriorapproachroboticassistedradicalprostatectomyandidentificationofthelearningcurveasinglesurgeonseries