Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case

We present here a rare case of heterotopic ossification in interspinous/interlaminar Coflex device. The classical surgical indications for these implants are degenerative canal stenosis, discogenic low back pain, disk herniations, facet syndrome, and instability. However, fractures of spinous proces...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giuseppe Maida, Eleonora Marcati, Silvio Sarubbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Surgery
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/970642
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567046795165696
author Giuseppe Maida
Eleonora Marcati
Silvio Sarubbo
author_facet Giuseppe Maida
Eleonora Marcati
Silvio Sarubbo
author_sort Giuseppe Maida
collection DOAJ
description We present here a rare case of heterotopic ossification in interspinous/interlaminar Coflex device. The classical surgical indications for these implants are degenerative canal stenosis, discogenic low back pain, disk herniations, facet syndrome, and instability. However, fractures of spinous processes are a potential risk after interspinous/interlaminar devices’ implantation. Recently, heterotopic ossification, a well-known complication of hip and knee arthroplasty, has been reported after cervical and lumbar prosthesis. We performed undercutting and implantation of the dynamic interspinous/interlaminar device to treat an adult male patient with L4-L5 stenosis. The patient underwent 45-day imaging and clinical followup, and we observed both a neurological and imaging improvement. A CT bone scan, performed 3 years after surgery for recurrence of neurogenic claudication, showed a new stenosis due to an abnormal ossification all over the device. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of heterotopic ossification in an interspinous/interlaminar dynamic device. Accordingly, we aim to suggest it as a new complication of interspinous/interlaminar devices.
format Article
id doaj-art-a15e322bd9834c118da760a0210b977e
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6900
2090-6919
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Surgery
spelling doaj-art-a15e322bd9834c118da760a0210b977e2025-02-03T01:02:32ZengWileyCase Reports in Surgery2090-69002090-69192012-01-01201210.1155/2012/970642970642Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a CaseGiuseppe Maida0Eleonora Marcati1Silvio Sarubbo2Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University-Hospital S. Anna, 8 Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University-Hospital S. Anna, 8 Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University-Hospital S. Anna, 8 Via Aldo Moro, 44124 Ferrara, ItalyWe present here a rare case of heterotopic ossification in interspinous/interlaminar Coflex device. The classical surgical indications for these implants are degenerative canal stenosis, discogenic low back pain, disk herniations, facet syndrome, and instability. However, fractures of spinous processes are a potential risk after interspinous/interlaminar devices’ implantation. Recently, heterotopic ossification, a well-known complication of hip and knee arthroplasty, has been reported after cervical and lumbar prosthesis. We performed undercutting and implantation of the dynamic interspinous/interlaminar device to treat an adult male patient with L4-L5 stenosis. The patient underwent 45-day imaging and clinical followup, and we observed both a neurological and imaging improvement. A CT bone scan, performed 3 years after surgery for recurrence of neurogenic claudication, showed a new stenosis due to an abnormal ossification all over the device. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of heterotopic ossification in an interspinous/interlaminar dynamic device. Accordingly, we aim to suggest it as a new complication of interspinous/interlaminar devices.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/970642
spellingShingle Giuseppe Maida
Eleonora Marcati
Silvio Sarubbo
Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case
Case Reports in Surgery
title Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case
title_full Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case
title_fullStr Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case
title_full_unstemmed Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case
title_short Heterotopic Ossification in Vertebral Interlaminar/Interspinous Instrumentation: Report of a Case
title_sort heterotopic ossification in vertebral interlaminar interspinous instrumentation report of a case
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/970642
work_keys_str_mv AT giuseppemaida heterotopicossificationinvertebralinterlaminarinterspinousinstrumentationreportofacase
AT eleonoramarcati heterotopicossificationinvertebralinterlaminarinterspinousinstrumentationreportofacase
AT silviosarubbo heterotopicossificationinvertebralinterlaminarinterspinousinstrumentationreportofacase