Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context

Summary: Background: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities had high rates of COVID-19 infections and mortality during the global pandemic. We sought to quantify how many COVID-19 infections could have been averted through different decarceration strategies. Methods: We developed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Weyant, Jaimie P. Meyer, Daniel Bromberg, Chris Beyrer, Frederick L. Altice, Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002989
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846101945860751360
author Christopher Weyant
Jaimie P. Meyer
Daniel Bromberg
Chris Beyrer
Frederick L. Altice
Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert
author_facet Christopher Weyant
Jaimie P. Meyer
Daniel Bromberg
Chris Beyrer
Frederick L. Altice
Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert
author_sort Christopher Weyant
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities had high rates of COVID-19 infections and mortality during the global pandemic. We sought to quantify how many COVID-19 infections could have been averted through different decarceration strategies. Methods: We developed a set of stochastic simulation models of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in ICE facilities. Employing incremental mixture importance sampling (IMIS), we calibrated them to empirical targets derived from publicly available case time series for ICE facilities, and publicly available facility population censuses prior to vaccine availability (May 6, 2020 to December 31, 2020). The models included infection importation from extra-facility sources. We evaluated reduction of the incarcerated population by 10–90%. People who were decarcerated faced background cumulative risks of infection and detection based on a weighted average of county-level estimates from the covidestim model, which is a Bayesian evidence synthesis model. Findings: Without decarceration, the infection rate was 5.05 per 1000 person-days (95% CrI 3.40–6.81) and case rate was 1.53 per 1000 person-days (95% CrI 1.04–2.02). Rates declined linearly when decarceration did not reduce contacts of people remaining in facilities and faster than linearly when it did reduce contacts. At all decarceration levels, rates were substantially higher when contacts were not reduced. Even with 90% decarceration, infection rates for people remaining in facilities were higher than or comparable to otherwise similar free-living people. Interpretation: The decline in COVID-19 infection rates with decarceration was linear or faster than linear depending on how decarceration was implemented. Our findings highlight infection risks associated with incarceration, which compound other health harms of incarceration. Funding: Stanford’s COVID-19 Emergency Response Fund; the National Institute on Drug Abuse; and the National Institute of Mental Health.
format Article
id doaj-art-a15b3823f85743a5adf4abab3da7cc5e
institution Kabale University
issn 2667-193X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
spelling doaj-art-a15b3823f85743a5adf4abab3da7cc5e2024-12-28T05:23:03ZengElsevierThe Lancet Regional Health. Americas2667-193X2025-02-0142100971Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in contextChristopher Weyant0Jaimie P. Meyer1Daniel Bromberg2Chris Beyrer3Frederick L. Altice4Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert5Department of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Center for Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USASection of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA; Corresponding author. Yale School of Medicine and Yale School of Public Health, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USAGlobal Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USASection of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USADepartment of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Center for Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USASummary: Background: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities had high rates of COVID-19 infections and mortality during the global pandemic. We sought to quantify how many COVID-19 infections could have been averted through different decarceration strategies. Methods: We developed a set of stochastic simulation models of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in ICE facilities. Employing incremental mixture importance sampling (IMIS), we calibrated them to empirical targets derived from publicly available case time series for ICE facilities, and publicly available facility population censuses prior to vaccine availability (May 6, 2020 to December 31, 2020). The models included infection importation from extra-facility sources. We evaluated reduction of the incarcerated population by 10–90%. People who were decarcerated faced background cumulative risks of infection and detection based on a weighted average of county-level estimates from the covidestim model, which is a Bayesian evidence synthesis model. Findings: Without decarceration, the infection rate was 5.05 per 1000 person-days (95% CrI 3.40–6.81) and case rate was 1.53 per 1000 person-days (95% CrI 1.04–2.02). Rates declined linearly when decarceration did not reduce contacts of people remaining in facilities and faster than linearly when it did reduce contacts. At all decarceration levels, rates were substantially higher when contacts were not reduced. Even with 90% decarceration, infection rates for people remaining in facilities were higher than or comparable to otherwise similar free-living people. Interpretation: The decline in COVID-19 infection rates with decarceration was linear or faster than linear depending on how decarceration was implemented. Our findings highlight infection risks associated with incarceration, which compound other health harms of incarceration. Funding: Stanford’s COVID-19 Emergency Response Fund; the National Institute on Drug Abuse; and the National Institute of Mental Health.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002989IncarcerationImmigration detentionCOVID-19Simulation modeling
spellingShingle Christopher Weyant
Jaimie P. Meyer
Daniel Bromberg
Chris Beyrer
Frederick L. Altice
Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert
Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context
The Lancet Regional Health. Americas
Incarceration
Immigration detention
COVID-19
Simulation modeling
title Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context
title_full Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context
title_fullStr Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context
title_full_unstemmed Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context
title_short Decarceration and COVID-19 infections in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities: a simulation modeling studyResearch in context
title_sort decarceration and covid 19 infections in u s immigration and customs enforcement detention facilities a simulation modeling studyresearch in context
topic Incarceration
Immigration detention
COVID-19
Simulation modeling
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002989
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherweyant decarcerationandcovid19infectionsinusimmigrationandcustomsenforcementdetentionfacilitiesasimulationmodelingstudyresearchincontext
AT jaimiepmeyer decarcerationandcovid19infectionsinusimmigrationandcustomsenforcementdetentionfacilitiesasimulationmodelingstudyresearchincontext
AT danielbromberg decarcerationandcovid19infectionsinusimmigrationandcustomsenforcementdetentionfacilitiesasimulationmodelingstudyresearchincontext
AT chrisbeyrer decarcerationandcovid19infectionsinusimmigrationandcustomsenforcementdetentionfacilitiesasimulationmodelingstudyresearchincontext
AT fredericklaltice decarcerationandcovid19infectionsinusimmigrationandcustomsenforcementdetentionfacilitiesasimulationmodelingstudyresearchincontext
AT jeremydgoldhaberfiebert decarcerationandcovid19infectionsinusimmigrationandcustomsenforcementdetentionfacilitiesasimulationmodelingstudyresearchincontext