Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law

After presenting the main mechanisms of parliamentary systems on a comparative level and their mutual differences, the author highlights the possibility of multiple elections of a government in a single parliamentary term, even after having a prior government voted out of confidence, as an essential...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stojanović Matija R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade 2024-01-01
Series:Strani pravni život
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0039-2138/2024/0039-21382401109S.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850198680156504064
author Stojanović Matija R.
author_facet Stojanović Matija R.
author_sort Stojanović Matija R.
collection DOAJ
description After presenting the main mechanisms of parliamentary systems on a comparative level and their mutual differences, the author highlights the possibility of multiple elections of a government in a single parliamentary term, even after having a prior government voted out of confidence, as an essential element of the continental parliamentary system. The author then points out to different solutions by which this possibility is realized in the constitutions of European parliamentary democracies. The author then highlights the solution of the Constitution of Montenegro from 2007 as specific in terms of its nomotechnics. In the continuation of the work, the author presents a linguistic and systemic interpretation of the norms of that Constitution and examines the thesis that it introduces a "cabinet" system of government. The author then presents how the office holders in Montenegro actually interpret and apply the stated norms of the Constitution. After comparing the text of the Constitution and the practice of the office holders, the author questions the issue of their mutual compatibility. In doing so, the author points to the opinion of the Venice Commission, the Constitutional Court of Montenegro, exploring as well the grounding of the thesis that the aforementioned practice is based, not on the text of the Constitution, but on constitutional customs. Finally, the author critically examines the current version of the Constitution of Montenegro, concluding on the necessity of revising the Constitution of Montenegro in the part of its Government election procedure.
format Article
id doaj-art-a158b82f89264b698e8a1c216fa7b669
institution OA Journals
issn 0039-2138
2620-1127
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Institute of Comparative Law, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Strani pravni život
spelling doaj-art-a158b82f89264b698e8a1c216fa7b6692025-08-20T02:12:49ZengInstitute of Comparative Law, BelgradeStrani pravni život0039-21382620-11272024-01-0168110912910.56461/SPZ_24106KJ0039-21382401109SGovernment election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative lawStojanović Matija R.0Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, SerbiaAfter presenting the main mechanisms of parliamentary systems on a comparative level and their mutual differences, the author highlights the possibility of multiple elections of a government in a single parliamentary term, even after having a prior government voted out of confidence, as an essential element of the continental parliamentary system. The author then points out to different solutions by which this possibility is realized in the constitutions of European parliamentary democracies. The author then highlights the solution of the Constitution of Montenegro from 2007 as specific in terms of its nomotechnics. In the continuation of the work, the author presents a linguistic and systemic interpretation of the norms of that Constitution and examines the thesis that it introduces a "cabinet" system of government. The author then presents how the office holders in Montenegro actually interpret and apply the stated norms of the Constitution. After comparing the text of the Constitution and the practice of the office holders, the author questions the issue of their mutual compatibility. In doing so, the author points to the opinion of the Venice Commission, the Constitutional Court of Montenegro, exploring as well the grounding of the thesis that the aforementioned practice is based, not on the text of the Constitution, but on constitutional customs. Finally, the author critically examines the current version of the Constitution of Montenegro, concluding on the necessity of revising the Constitution of Montenegro in the part of its Government election procedure.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0039-2138/2024/0039-21382401109S.pdfconstitution of montenegrogovernment electionconstitutional custominvestiturecabinet system
spellingShingle Stojanović Matija R.
Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
Strani pravni život
constitution of montenegro
government election
constitutional custom
investiture
cabinet system
title Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
title_full Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
title_fullStr Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
title_full_unstemmed Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
title_short Government election in the constitution of Montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
title_sort government election in the constitution of montenegro from 2007 in light of comparative law
topic constitution of montenegro
government election
constitutional custom
investiture
cabinet system
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0039-2138/2024/0039-21382401109S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stojanovicmatijar governmentelectionintheconstitutionofmontenegrofrom2007inlightofcomparativelaw