Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles

In the 16th and 17th centuries, Parisians sometimes married a homonymous relative. These alliances did not seem to be a taboo, they undoubtedly participated in the cycles of alliances and replicated alliances with distant relatives which constituted one of the components of modern kinship. The artic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert Descimon
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Centre de Recherches Historiques 2018-06-01
Series:L'Atelier du CRH
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/8615
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850110688587939840
author Robert Descimon
author_facet Robert Descimon
author_sort Robert Descimon
collection DOAJ
description In the 16th and 17th centuries, Parisians sometimes married a homonymous relative. These alliances did not seem to be a taboo, they undoubtedly participated in the cycles of alliances and replicated alliances with distant relatives which constituted one of the components of modern kinship. The article analyses the context of a number of such alliances in the paternal name to present the hypothesis that they are, like fidéicommis, attempts to concentrate the constituent elements of lineages (property and dignity) whose fragility was felt more in a context of crisis of the transmission of social domination.
format Article
id doaj-art-a140de71e78e43b698f0efa74ad9c3cf
institution OA Journals
issn 1760-7914
language fra
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher Centre de Recherches Historiques
record_format Article
series L'Atelier du CRH
spelling doaj-art-a140de71e78e43b698f0efa74ad9c3cf2025-08-20T02:37:47ZfraCentre de Recherches HistoriquesL'Atelier du CRH1760-79142018-06-011910.4000/acrh.8615Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie sièclesRobert DescimonIn the 16th and 17th centuries, Parisians sometimes married a homonymous relative. These alliances did not seem to be a taboo, they undoubtedly participated in the cycles of alliances and replicated alliances with distant relatives which constituted one of the components of modern kinship. The article analyses the context of a number of such alliances in the paternal name to present the hypothesis that they are, like fidéicommis, attempts to concentrate the constituent elements of lineages (property and dignity) whose fragility was felt more in a context of crisis of the transmission of social domination.https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/8615kinshiphonourlineageonomastic endogamyconjugalitysocial reproduction
spellingShingle Robert Descimon
Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles
L'Atelier du CRH
kinship
honour
lineage
onomastic endogamy
conjugality
social reproduction
title Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles
title_full Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles
title_fullStr Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles
title_full_unstemmed Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles
title_short Le trop proche ? Mariages dans le nom du père à Paris aux xvie et xviie siècles
title_sort le trop proche mariages dans le nom du pere a paris aux xvie et xviie siecles
topic kinship
honour
lineage
onomastic endogamy
conjugality
social reproduction
url https://journals.openedition.org/acrh/8615
work_keys_str_mv AT robertdescimon letropprochemariagesdanslenomdupereaparisauxxvieetxviiesiecles