A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing

Abstract Background Reducing above-guideline opioid prescribing is one approach to reducing the availability of unused opioids. We describe contextual factors affecting the implementation and outcomes of a successful email ‘nudge’ aimed at reducing post-operative opioid prescribing, with the goal of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meghan C. Martinez, Kathryn Bouskill, Xiaowei Sherry Yan, Allison Kirkegaard, Jason N. Doctor, Katherine E. Watkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12651-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850184036417273856
author Meghan C. Martinez
Kathryn Bouskill
Xiaowei Sherry Yan
Allison Kirkegaard
Jason N. Doctor
Katherine E. Watkins
author_facet Meghan C. Martinez
Kathryn Bouskill
Xiaowei Sherry Yan
Allison Kirkegaard
Jason N. Doctor
Katherine E. Watkins
author_sort Meghan C. Martinez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Reducing above-guideline opioid prescribing is one approach to reducing the availability of unused opioids. We describe contextual factors affecting the implementation and outcomes of a successful email ‘nudge’ aimed at reducing post-operative opioid prescribing, with the goal of informing future implementation and dissemination efforts. Methods Between October 2021-September 2022, we sent email nudges to general, orthopedic, and obstetrics/gynecology surgeons at 19 hospitals in a large integrated healthcare system in California whose patients had post-operative opioid prescriptions that exceeded guideline-recommended quantities. We then interviewed 36 surgeons between September 2022-January 2023 and coded and themed transcripts and implementation process documents from the study. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand the contextual factors impacting nudge design, implementation, and effectiveness. Results Factors across all five CFIR domains were found to be important in understanding the acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability of the intervention. In the Innovation Domain, key factors included the method of nudge delivery, the validity of comparators, and the design and layout of the nudge itself. The interaction between the nudges and existing state regulations (Outer Setting Domain) caused confusion, while the size, structure, and centralization of hospitals (Inner Setting Domain) influenced communication and leadership engagement, underscoring the need for local champions (Individuals Domain). In the Implementation Process Domain, workflow considerations emerged, e.g., the fact that the surgeon performing the procedure was at times not the discharge prescriber, the need for pre-intervention education, and the importance of ensuring surgeons have a clear process to access additional information when questions arise about nudge content. Conclusions Contextual factors related to how the nudges were implemented influenced their acceptability among surgeons. Future dissemination efforts of similar interventions to curb opioid overprescribing should take these design considerations into account, including how to account for variations in prescribing workflows, the amount of information provided in the nudge, how information is construed, and how the rest of the hospital system can adjust to encourage guideline-supported opioid prescribing at the point of post-surgical discharge. These types of considerations may also apply to other clinician-directed, nudge-based interventions beyond the subject of opioid prescribing. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05070338, Registration Date: October 19, 2021.
format Article
id doaj-art-a13703df0797466e9b4df665b90724be
institution OA Journals
issn 1472-6963
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj-art-a13703df0797466e9b4df665b90724be2025-08-20T02:17:09ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632025-04-0125111510.1186/s12913-025-12651-7A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribingMeghan C. Martinez0Kathryn Bouskill1Xiaowei Sherry Yan2Allison Kirkegaard3Jason N. Doctor4Katherine E. Watkins5Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute & Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter HealthRAND CorporationCenter for Health Systems Research, Sutter HealthRAND CorporationSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern CaliforniaRAND CorporationAbstract Background Reducing above-guideline opioid prescribing is one approach to reducing the availability of unused opioids. We describe contextual factors affecting the implementation and outcomes of a successful email ‘nudge’ aimed at reducing post-operative opioid prescribing, with the goal of informing future implementation and dissemination efforts. Methods Between October 2021-September 2022, we sent email nudges to general, orthopedic, and obstetrics/gynecology surgeons at 19 hospitals in a large integrated healthcare system in California whose patients had post-operative opioid prescriptions that exceeded guideline-recommended quantities. We then interviewed 36 surgeons between September 2022-January 2023 and coded and themed transcripts and implementation process documents from the study. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand the contextual factors impacting nudge design, implementation, and effectiveness. Results Factors across all five CFIR domains were found to be important in understanding the acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability of the intervention. In the Innovation Domain, key factors included the method of nudge delivery, the validity of comparators, and the design and layout of the nudge itself. The interaction between the nudges and existing state regulations (Outer Setting Domain) caused confusion, while the size, structure, and centralization of hospitals (Inner Setting Domain) influenced communication and leadership engagement, underscoring the need for local champions (Individuals Domain). In the Implementation Process Domain, workflow considerations emerged, e.g., the fact that the surgeon performing the procedure was at times not the discharge prescriber, the need for pre-intervention education, and the importance of ensuring surgeons have a clear process to access additional information when questions arise about nudge content. Conclusions Contextual factors related to how the nudges were implemented influenced their acceptability among surgeons. Future dissemination efforts of similar interventions to curb opioid overprescribing should take these design considerations into account, including how to account for variations in prescribing workflows, the amount of information provided in the nudge, how information is construed, and how the rest of the hospital system can adjust to encourage guideline-supported opioid prescribing at the point of post-surgical discharge. These types of considerations may also apply to other clinician-directed, nudge-based interventions beyond the subject of opioid prescribing. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05070338, Registration Date: October 19, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12651-7NudgesBehavioral interventionsCFIRImplementation scienceOpioidsSurgeons
spellingShingle Meghan C. Martinez
Kathryn Bouskill
Xiaowei Sherry Yan
Allison Kirkegaard
Jason N. Doctor
Katherine E. Watkins
A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing
BMC Health Services Research
Nudges
Behavioral interventions
CFIR
Implementation science
Opioids
Surgeons
title A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing
title_full A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing
title_fullStr A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing
title_short A qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post-surgical opioid prescribing
title_sort qualitative analysis on the implementation of a nudge intervention to reduce post surgical opioid prescribing
topic Nudges
Behavioral interventions
CFIR
Implementation science
Opioids
Surgeons
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12651-7
work_keys_str_mv AT meghancmartinez aqualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT kathrynbouskill aqualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT xiaoweisherryyan aqualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT allisonkirkegaard aqualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT jasonndoctor aqualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT katherineewatkins aqualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT meghancmartinez qualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT kathrynbouskill qualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT xiaoweisherryyan qualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT allisonkirkegaard qualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT jasonndoctor qualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing
AT katherineewatkins qualitativeanalysisontheimplementationofanudgeinterventiontoreducepostsurgicalopioidprescribing