Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture

ABSTRACT During a pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) translocation study in New Mexico, USA, in 2014, we outfitted 26 pregnant female pronghorn with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs) to better understand cause‐specific fawn mortality. All VITs were equipped with both temperature and photo (i.e., li...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily R. Conant, Warren C. Conway, Mark C. Wallace, Nicole M. Tatman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-03-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1039
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850255295089999872
author Emily R. Conant
Warren C. Conway
Mark C. Wallace
Nicole M. Tatman
author_facet Emily R. Conant
Warren C. Conway
Mark C. Wallace
Nicole M. Tatman
author_sort Emily R. Conant
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT During a pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) translocation study in New Mexico, USA, in 2014, we outfitted 26 pregnant female pronghorn with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs) to better understand cause‐specific fawn mortality. All VITs were equipped with both temperature and photo (i.e., light) sensors. Partial expulsions were detected from VITs in April 2014, at least 2 weeks prior to fawn observations. In these instances, VITs were exposed to ambient daylight activating the photo sensor, which was “reset” daily after sunset. These false signals likely compromised both battery life as well as detection of actual fawn births as a result of time spent tracking false expulsions rather than focusing efforts on fawn capture. We tracked VITs of 19 females (n = 16 confirmed expelled). Expelled VITs assisted with fawn captures (n = 12) from 8 females. We were unable to capture fawns from some females with VITs because fawns were too old to capture or VIT signal failure limited our ability to correctly determine whether a birth occurred. Failure here is defined as a signal we were unable to hear due either to battery failure or geographic location of the VIT post‐expulsion. We also opportunistically captured fawns, either by monitoring and observing females outfitted with very‐high‐frequency (VHF) collars or using long‐range observations of unmarked females. Opportunistic captures resulted in fawn captures (n = 4) from 3 females with only VHF collars, and 13 fawns from 13 unmarked females. Fawn capture success from females whose VIT expelled was greater because fawns were smaller and less likely to flee. To minimize false expulsion signals in VITs, we recommend 1) modification of VIT wings to maintain position inside the vaginal canal until parturition, and 2) change VIT design to specifically fit pronghorn (i.e., design VITs using specific pronghorn vaginal canal measurement to ensure better VIT fit) to prevent premature partial or total expulsion. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-a12b85e26a244c57bf96874a2cc18d10
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-a12b85e26a244c57bf96874a2cc18d102025-08-20T01:56:55ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402020-03-0144115616210.1002/wsb.1039Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn CaptureEmily R. Conant0Warren C. Conway1Mark C. Wallace2Nicole M. Tatman3Department of Natural Resources Management Texas Tech University Lubbock TX 79409 USADepartment of Natural Resources Management Texas Tech University Lubbock TX 79409 USADepartment of Natural Resources Management Texas Tech University Lubbock TX 79409 USANew Mexico Department of Game and Fish Santa Fe NM 87507 USAABSTRACT During a pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) translocation study in New Mexico, USA, in 2014, we outfitted 26 pregnant female pronghorn with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs) to better understand cause‐specific fawn mortality. All VITs were equipped with both temperature and photo (i.e., light) sensors. Partial expulsions were detected from VITs in April 2014, at least 2 weeks prior to fawn observations. In these instances, VITs were exposed to ambient daylight activating the photo sensor, which was “reset” daily after sunset. These false signals likely compromised both battery life as well as detection of actual fawn births as a result of time spent tracking false expulsions rather than focusing efforts on fawn capture. We tracked VITs of 19 females (n = 16 confirmed expelled). Expelled VITs assisted with fawn captures (n = 12) from 8 females. We were unable to capture fawns from some females with VITs because fawns were too old to capture or VIT signal failure limited our ability to correctly determine whether a birth occurred. Failure here is defined as a signal we were unable to hear due either to battery failure or geographic location of the VIT post‐expulsion. We also opportunistically captured fawns, either by monitoring and observing females outfitted with very‐high‐frequency (VHF) collars or using long‐range observations of unmarked females. Opportunistic captures resulted in fawn captures (n = 4) from 3 females with only VHF collars, and 13 fawns from 13 unmarked females. Fawn capture success from females whose VIT expelled was greater because fawns were smaller and less likely to flee. To minimize false expulsion signals in VITs, we recommend 1) modification of VIT wings to maintain position inside the vaginal canal until parturition, and 2) change VIT design to specifically fit pronghorn (i.e., design VITs using specific pronghorn vaginal canal measurement to ensure better VIT fit) to prevent premature partial or total expulsion. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1039Antilocapra americanafawn capturefawnspronghornvaginal implant transmitterVIT
spellingShingle Emily R. Conant
Warren C. Conway
Mark C. Wallace
Nicole M. Tatman
Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Antilocapra americana
fawn capture
fawns
pronghorn
vaginal implant transmitter
VIT
title Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture
title_full Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture
title_fullStr Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture
title_short Vaginal Implant Transmitters as a Tool for Pronghorn Fawn Capture
title_sort vaginal implant transmitters as a tool for pronghorn fawn capture
topic Antilocapra americana
fawn capture
fawns
pronghorn
vaginal implant transmitter
VIT
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1039
work_keys_str_mv AT emilyrconant vaginalimplanttransmittersasatoolforpronghornfawncapture
AT warrencconway vaginalimplanttransmittersasatoolforpronghornfawncapture
AT markcwallace vaginalimplanttransmittersasatoolforpronghornfawncapture
AT nicolemtatman vaginalimplanttransmittersasatoolforpronghornfawncapture