What difference could Pragmatism have made? From architectural effects to architecture’s consequences
By the late 1990s, the once fruitful alliance between architecture and continental philosophy was perceived as being responsible for the apparent schism between architectural theory and practice. In that context, some saw Pragmatism as a potential alternative for reviving the architectural discourse...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Pauline Lefebvre |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
TU Delft OPEN Publishing
2017-07-01
|
| Series: | Footprint |
| Online Access: | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/1174 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE DIFFERENTLY? A PATIENT WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
by: E. P. Panchenko
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Towards a pragmatic architecture. The case of Tous & Fargas
by: David Hernandez Falagan
Published: (2017-10-01) -
What architecture for the middle-class?
by: Leonor Matos Silva, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
What Finitism Could Not Be
by: Matthias Schirn, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
A fidelity made of stone. The Armenian Architecture seen from the Vayots-Dzor’ fringe
by: Cecilia Maria Roberta Luschi, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)