Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions
Firstly, based on literature research and a Delphi consultation, the opinions of 15 domestic experts in the field of hospice care services were summarized and sorted out. The evaluation indicators for humanistic ward rounds in hospice care service institutions were constructed, consisting of 4 prima...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | zho |
| Published: |
Editorial Office of Medicine and Philosophy
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Yixue yu zhexue |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://yizhe.dmu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.01.08 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850148685674971136 |
|---|---|
| author | Yiwen MAO Yumiao WU Yilei LIU Jun WU Yikai MI Yongxing SHI |
| author_facet | Yiwen MAO Yumiao WU Yilei LIU Jun WU Yikai MI Yongxing SHI |
| author_sort | Yiwen MAO |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Firstly, based on literature research and a Delphi consultation, the opinions of 15 domestic experts in the field of hospice care services were summarized and sorted out. The evaluation indicators for humanistic ward rounds in hospice care service institutions were constructed, consisting of 4 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 22 tertiary indicators, with an expert consistency coefficient of 0.654 (P＜0.05). Secondly, a survey was conducted on 120 hospice care service personnel from 13 institutions conducting humanistic ward rounds to evaluate the feasibility of the indicator system. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for 22 indicators was 0.820, and the Guttman halving coefficient was 0.844. The CVI values for all tertiary indicators exceeded 0.78. The evaluation indicator system demonstrated good reliability, validity, and feasibility, providing a solid foundation for further designing specific evaluation tools and promoting standardized implementation of humanistic ward rounds in hospice care. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a10fd853a19344d9a940bb6aa45b7c77 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1002-0772 |
| language | zho |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Editorial Office of Medicine and Philosophy |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Yixue yu zhexue |
| spelling | doaj-art-a10fd853a19344d9a940bb6aa45b7c772025-08-20T02:27:11ZzhoEditorial Office of Medicine and PhilosophyYixue yu zhexue1002-07722025-01-01461404410.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.01.081-9-maoyiwenResearch on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care InstitutionsYiwen MAO0Yumiao WU1Yilei LIU2Jun WU3Yikai MI4Yongxing SHI5Hospice Care Department, Shanghai Putuo Changzheng Community Health Service Center, Shanghai 200333, ChinaOffice, Shanghai Putuo District Health Affairs Management Center, Shanghai 200063, ChinaOffice, Shanghai Putuo Changzheng Community Health Service Center, Shanghai 200333, ChinaOffice, Shanghai Putuo Changzheng Community Health Service Center, Shanghai 200333, ChinaChina Hospital Development Research Institute, Community Medicine Research Institute, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200050, ChinaShanghai Hospice Care Management Center, Shanghai 200333, ChinaFirstly, based on literature research and a Delphi consultation, the opinions of 15 domestic experts in the field of hospice care services were summarized and sorted out. The evaluation indicators for humanistic ward rounds in hospice care service institutions were constructed, consisting of 4 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 22 tertiary indicators, with an expert consistency coefficient of 0.654 (P＜0.05). Secondly, a survey was conducted on 120 hospice care service personnel from 13 institutions conducting humanistic ward rounds to evaluate the feasibility of the indicator system. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for 22 indicators was 0.820, and the Guttman halving coefficient was 0.844. The CVI values for all tertiary indicators exceeded 0.78. The evaluation indicator system demonstrated good reliability, validity, and feasibility, providing a solid foundation for further designing specific evaluation tools and promoting standardized implementation of humanistic ward rounds in hospice care.https://yizhe.dmu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.01.08hospice carehumanistic ward roundevaluation indicatorsfeasibility |
| spellingShingle | Yiwen MAO Yumiao WU Yilei LIU Jun WU Yikai MI Yongxing SHI Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions Yixue yu zhexue hospice care humanistic ward round evaluation indicators feasibility |
| title | Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions |
| title_full | Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions |
| title_fullStr | Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions |
| title_short | Research on Evaluation Indicators for Humanistic Ward Rounds in Hospice Care Institutions |
| title_sort | research on evaluation indicators for humanistic ward rounds in hospice care institutions |
| topic | hospice care humanistic ward round evaluation indicators feasibility |
| url | https://yizhe.dmu.edu.cn/article/doi/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.01.08 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yiwenmao researchonevaluationindicatorsforhumanisticwardroundsinhospicecareinstitutions AT yumiaowu researchonevaluationindicatorsforhumanisticwardroundsinhospicecareinstitutions AT yileiliu researchonevaluationindicatorsforhumanisticwardroundsinhospicecareinstitutions AT junwu researchonevaluationindicatorsforhumanisticwardroundsinhospicecareinstitutions AT yikaimi researchonevaluationindicatorsforhumanisticwardroundsinhospicecareinstitutions AT yongxingshi researchonevaluationindicatorsforhumanisticwardroundsinhospicecareinstitutions |