Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards

Abstract Objective This study assesses the comparative performance of Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) and conventional techniques in detecting honey adulteration. Standard analytical methods, in accordance with ISIRI guidelines, were evaluated alongside δ13C isotopic analysis via IRMS across...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbas Alimoradian, Nafiseh Khansari, Mahdi Abdollahi, Behnoosh Ansari Asl, Sonia Asadi, Akbar Yousefi Maghool, Arash Rabiei, Ali Khademi, Mohsen Shamsi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07287-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850270813656186880
author Abbas Alimoradian
Nafiseh Khansari
Mahdi Abdollahi
Behnoosh Ansari Asl
Sonia Asadi
Akbar Yousefi Maghool
Arash Rabiei
Ali Khademi
Mohsen Shamsi
author_facet Abbas Alimoradian
Nafiseh Khansari
Mahdi Abdollahi
Behnoosh Ansari Asl
Sonia Asadi
Akbar Yousefi Maghool
Arash Rabiei
Ali Khademi
Mohsen Shamsi
author_sort Abbas Alimoradian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study assesses the comparative performance of Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) and conventional techniques in detecting honey adulteration. Standard analytical methods, in accordance with ISIRI guidelines, were evaluated alongside δ13C isotopic analysis via IRMS across a dataset of 20 honey samples. Conventional analytical techniques were employed to evaluate parameters such as pre-hydrolysis reducing sugars, sucrose content, the fructose-to-glucose ratio, proline, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). The advanced IRMS technique was utilized to determine δ13C values for glucose with high accuracy and sensitivity. The carbohydrate profile of honey, including glucose, fructose, disaccharides, and trisaccharides, was analyzed using LC/IRMS. A comparative assessment of both methods was conducted on twenty honey samples, following ISIRI guidelines. Results While conventional methods met ISIRI criteria in 18 out of 20 samples, IRMS produced contrasting findings—only 2 samples were identified as genuine and free from adulteration. Statistical evaluation using Prism software revealed a significant discrepancy between the two techniques, with a p-value < 0.05, indicating stronger confidence in IRMS results. The findings highlight the necessity of reconsidering current protocols for honey adulteration detection in order to preserve the purity and credibility of this high-value natural product. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-a10a925bcbce4e8ba0c437f8d9cc81f5
institution OA Journals
issn 1756-0500
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj-art-a10a925bcbce4e8ba0c437f8d9cc81f52025-08-20T01:52:25ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002025-05-0118111210.1186/s13104-025-07287-zComparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standardsAbbas Alimoradian0Nafiseh Khansari1Mahdi Abdollahi2Behnoosh Ansari Asl3Sonia Asadi4Akbar Yousefi Maghool5Arash Rabiei6Ali Khademi7Mohsen Shamsi8Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical SciencesFood and Drug Deputy, Arak University of Medical SciencesArak University of Medical SciencesFood and Drug Deputy, Arak University of Medical SciencesArak University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Arak UniversityDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Bu-Ali Sina UniversityDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Alborz Campus, University of TehranDepartment of Public Health, School of Health, Arak University of Medical SciencesAbstract Objective This study assesses the comparative performance of Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) and conventional techniques in detecting honey adulteration. Standard analytical methods, in accordance with ISIRI guidelines, were evaluated alongside δ13C isotopic analysis via IRMS across a dataset of 20 honey samples. Conventional analytical techniques were employed to evaluate parameters such as pre-hydrolysis reducing sugars, sucrose content, the fructose-to-glucose ratio, proline, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). The advanced IRMS technique was utilized to determine δ13C values for glucose with high accuracy and sensitivity. The carbohydrate profile of honey, including glucose, fructose, disaccharides, and trisaccharides, was analyzed using LC/IRMS. A comparative assessment of both methods was conducted on twenty honey samples, following ISIRI guidelines. Results While conventional methods met ISIRI criteria in 18 out of 20 samples, IRMS produced contrasting findings—only 2 samples were identified as genuine and free from adulteration. Statistical evaluation using Prism software revealed a significant discrepancy between the two techniques, with a p-value < 0.05, indicating stronger confidence in IRMS results. The findings highlight the necessity of reconsidering current protocols for honey adulteration detection in order to preserve the purity and credibility of this high-value natural product. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07287-zIsotope ratio mass spectrometryHoneyLiquid chromatographyAdulteration
spellingShingle Abbas Alimoradian
Nafiseh Khansari
Mahdi Abdollahi
Behnoosh Ansari Asl
Sonia Asadi
Akbar Yousefi Maghool
Arash Rabiei
Ali Khademi
Mohsen Shamsi
Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards
BMC Research Notes
Isotope ratio mass spectrometry
Honey
Liquid chromatography
Adulteration
title Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards
title_full Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards
title_short Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards
title_sort comparative analysis of conventional and irms techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with isiri standards
topic Isotope ratio mass spectrometry
Honey
Liquid chromatography
Adulteration
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07287-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasalimoradian comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT nafisehkhansari comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT mahdiabdollahi comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT behnooshansariasl comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT soniaasadi comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT akbaryousefimaghool comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT arashrabiei comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT alikhademi comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards
AT mohsenshamsi comparativeanalysisofconventionalandirmstechniquesforhoneyadulterationdetectioninaccordancewithisiristandards