Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?

In times of increasing interest in plants, a major challenge lies in effectively communicating the essence of Botany: What exactly does it encompass? Who are botanists? And how do botanical gardens differ from other types of gardens? To address these questions, refined definitions that account for t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lorenzo Peruzzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2025-01-01
Series:Italian Botanist
Online Access:https://italianbotanist.pensoft.net/article/145382/download/pdf/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590682644021248
author Lorenzo Peruzzi
author_facet Lorenzo Peruzzi
author_sort Lorenzo Peruzzi
collection DOAJ
description In times of increasing interest in plants, a major challenge lies in effectively communicating the essence of Botany: What exactly does it encompass? Who are botanists? And how do botanical gardens differ from other types of gardens? To address these questions, refined definitions that account for the blurred boundaries between the fields of Botany, Agronomy, and Medicine are proposed. By representing these three disciplines in a ternary plot, I suggest defining Botany as a biological discipline where studies have a predominant (> 50%) component of basic plant science—this area is referred to here as the ‘Triangle of Botany’. In this context, a botanist can be defined as a professional or scientist whose primary research focus is on basic research related to plant organisms. A botanical garden, therefore, is a space dedicated to the cultivation, conservation, study, and display of plants, based primarily on scientific principles grounded in basic research. The overlap between disciplines contributes to the communication difficulties in clearly defining what botanists do, especially when compared to professionals such as agronomists or doctors. The lack of distinct boundaries between these fields can lead the general public to misinterpret Botany and its practitioners. As a result, people may seek advice from “experts” who may not necessarily have a strong foundation in Botany. Similarly, botanical gardens are often perceived by the public as merely aesthetic spaces, akin to vegetable gardens or parks, rather than as scientifically-driven institutions. Disseminating refined definitions could help bridge the gap in public understanding of the role of Botany, fostering a clearer appreciation of this essential scientific field.
format Article
id doaj-art-a0d51320feca4775a80c1ce8598bb821
institution Kabale University
issn 2531-4033
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series Italian Botanist
spelling doaj-art-a0d51320feca4775a80c1ce8598bb8212025-01-23T08:30:45ZengPensoft PublishersItalian Botanist2531-40332025-01-0119152010.3897/italianbotanist.19.145382145382Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?Lorenzo Peruzzi0University of PisaIn times of increasing interest in plants, a major challenge lies in effectively communicating the essence of Botany: What exactly does it encompass? Who are botanists? And how do botanical gardens differ from other types of gardens? To address these questions, refined definitions that account for the blurred boundaries between the fields of Botany, Agronomy, and Medicine are proposed. By representing these three disciplines in a ternary plot, I suggest defining Botany as a biological discipline where studies have a predominant (> 50%) component of basic plant science—this area is referred to here as the ‘Triangle of Botany’. In this context, a botanist can be defined as a professional or scientist whose primary research focus is on basic research related to plant organisms. A botanical garden, therefore, is a space dedicated to the cultivation, conservation, study, and display of plants, based primarily on scientific principles grounded in basic research. The overlap between disciplines contributes to the communication difficulties in clearly defining what botanists do, especially when compared to professionals such as agronomists or doctors. The lack of distinct boundaries between these fields can lead the general public to misinterpret Botany and its practitioners. As a result, people may seek advice from “experts” who may not necessarily have a strong foundation in Botany. Similarly, botanical gardens are often perceived by the public as merely aesthetic spaces, akin to vegetable gardens or parks, rather than as scientifically-driven institutions. Disseminating refined definitions could help bridge the gap in public understanding of the role of Botany, fostering a clearer appreciation of this essential scientific field.https://italianbotanist.pensoft.net/article/145382/download/pdf/
spellingShingle Lorenzo Peruzzi
Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?
Italian Botanist
title Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?
title_full Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?
title_fullStr Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?
title_full_unstemmed Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?
title_short Some claim for the end of Botany… but what is Botany today?
title_sort some claim for the end of botany but what is botany today
url https://italianbotanist.pensoft.net/article/145382/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzoperuzzi someclaimfortheendofbotanybutwhatisbotanytoday