Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters

In this study, the seclusion life of al-Ghazālī, which began with his departure from Baghdad in 488/1095 and continued until his death, is analyzed. In light of his letters, qualitative research methods were used to analyze and classify al-Ghazālī’s period of seclusion, and the meaning of the period...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Çoban
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Istanbul University Press 2024-09-01
Series:İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/6800E801CC064C5AAEE448DB04D6861F
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849311721563357184
author Ali Çoban
author_facet Ali Çoban
author_sort Ali Çoban
collection DOAJ
description In this study, the seclusion life of al-Ghazālī, which began with his departure from Baghdad in 488/1095 and continued until his death, is analyzed. In light of his letters, qualitative research methods were used to analyze and classify al-Ghazālī’s period of seclusion, and the meaning of the period of seclusion was emphasized. While al-Ghazālī was at the height of his popularity in Baghdad, he abandoned everything and went into seclusion. It seems that this process was interrupted by the transition to teaching again in Nishapur after more than 10 years of halvah (seclusion). Even though al-Ghazālī described himself as someone who retreated into seclusion, it is understood from his letters compiled under the title of Fezāil al-Anām that his seclusion refers to his opposition to working in state institutions and under the orders of the ruling class. During al-Ghazali’s seclusion, he wrote books, worked as a muderris, and maintained relations with the ruling class through his letters. As a result, it can be seen that he did not refrain from lecturing and engaging in theo-political relations until his death. He maintained his correspondence with the political elites, especially the Nizam al-Mulk family, for reasons such as issuing warnings, offering advice, providing references, lodging complaints about bad rulers, and explaining about the situation of the people of Tus. Therefore, he was not an ascetic solely who devotes himself to the hereafter, but rather a person who was aware of the realities of his age and had not severed his ties with the ruling class of the time.
format Article
id doaj-art-a05b244a2c2849319929d3fbda14e9dc
institution Kabale University
issn 2717-6967
language Arabic
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-a05b244a2c2849319929d3fbda14e9dc2025-08-20T03:53:18ZaraIstanbul University Pressİslam Tetkikleri Dergisi2717-69672024-09-0114247349910.26650/iuitd.2024.1489001123456Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His LettersAli Çoban0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-5017Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Konya, TurkiyeIn this study, the seclusion life of al-Ghazālī, which began with his departure from Baghdad in 488/1095 and continued until his death, is analyzed. In light of his letters, qualitative research methods were used to analyze and classify al-Ghazālī’s period of seclusion, and the meaning of the period of seclusion was emphasized. While al-Ghazālī was at the height of his popularity in Baghdad, he abandoned everything and went into seclusion. It seems that this process was interrupted by the transition to teaching again in Nishapur after more than 10 years of halvah (seclusion). Even though al-Ghazālī described himself as someone who retreated into seclusion, it is understood from his letters compiled under the title of Fezāil al-Anām that his seclusion refers to his opposition to working in state institutions and under the orders of the ruling class. During al-Ghazali’s seclusion, he wrote books, worked as a muderris, and maintained relations with the ruling class through his letters. As a result, it can be seen that he did not refrain from lecturing and engaging in theo-political relations until his death. He maintained his correspondence with the political elites, especially the Nizam al-Mulk family, for reasons such as issuing warnings, offering advice, providing references, lodging complaints about bad rulers, and explaining about the situation of the people of Tus. Therefore, he was not an ascetic solely who devotes himself to the hereafter, but rather a person who was aware of the realities of his age and had not severed his ties with the ruling class of the time.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/6800E801CC064C5AAEE448DB04D6861Fsūfismal-ghazālībiographyseclusionfadhā’il al-anāmal-munqiz
spellingShingle Ali Çoban
Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters
İslam Tetkikleri Dergisi
sūfism
al-ghazālī
biography
seclusion
fadhā’il al-anām
al-munqiz
title Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters
title_full Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters
title_fullStr Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters
title_full_unstemmed Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters
title_short Contribution to the Biography of al-Ghazālī: Al-Ghazālī’s Seclusion Life in the Light of His Letters
title_sort contribution to the biography of al ghazali al ghazali s seclusion life in the light of his letters
topic sūfism
al-ghazālī
biography
seclusion
fadhā’il al-anām
al-munqiz
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/6800E801CC064C5AAEE448DB04D6861F
work_keys_str_mv AT alicoban contributiontothebiographyofalghazalialghazalisseclusionlifeinthelightofhisletters