Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands

IntroductionA better understanding of the relationship between water saturation and seismic characteristics of loosely deposited sand is crucial for assessing the liquefaction potential of open-pit mine dumps. The classic elastic models, based on Gassmann’s theory, are commonly used to constrain wat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tengfei Deng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2025.1561168/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850274423822614528
author Tengfei Deng
author_facet Tengfei Deng
author_sort Tengfei Deng
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionA better understanding of the relationship between water saturation and seismic characteristics of loosely deposited sand is crucial for assessing the liquefaction potential of open-pit mine dumps. The classic elastic models, based on Gassmann’s theory, are commonly used to constrain water saturation from seismic data. However, while effective at low frequencies, these models fail to capture macroscopic wave-induced fluid flow and poroelastic effects at higher frequencies, which may hinder the application of laboratory results to field conditions. In contrast, Biot’s poroelastic theory enables seismic wave propagation modeling across a broad frequency range.MethodsTo evaluate poroelastic effects in seismic monitoring, we compare elastic and poroelastic models in terms of wave velocities, Poisson’s ratio, P-wave travel time, and surface wave dispersion across different frequencies. Our study incorporates numerical simulations and experimental data to assess the extent of discrepancies between these models.ResultsOur findings show that the poroelastic model predicts seismic wave velocities with up to a 6% difference compared to the elastic model. While minimal differences are observed in field-scale surveys, the discrepancies become more significant in pilot plant experiments and ultrasonic measurements as frequency increases. These results highlight the influence of poroelastic effects, which are not captured adequately by elastic models at higher frequencies.DiscussionThe observed frequency-dependent discrepancies suggest that elastic models may be insufficient for high-frequency seismic applications. This underscores the need for improved methodologies that integrate poroelastic effects to enhance the scalability of laboratory findings to field conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-9ff6a12ea75e4c00a19990915fab18b5
institution OA Journals
issn 2296-6463
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj-art-9ff6a12ea75e4c00a19990915fab18b52025-08-20T01:51:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632025-04-011310.3389/feart.2025.15611681561168Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sandsTengfei DengIntroductionA better understanding of the relationship between water saturation and seismic characteristics of loosely deposited sand is crucial for assessing the liquefaction potential of open-pit mine dumps. The classic elastic models, based on Gassmann’s theory, are commonly used to constrain water saturation from seismic data. However, while effective at low frequencies, these models fail to capture macroscopic wave-induced fluid flow and poroelastic effects at higher frequencies, which may hinder the application of laboratory results to field conditions. In contrast, Biot’s poroelastic theory enables seismic wave propagation modeling across a broad frequency range.MethodsTo evaluate poroelastic effects in seismic monitoring, we compare elastic and poroelastic models in terms of wave velocities, Poisson’s ratio, P-wave travel time, and surface wave dispersion across different frequencies. Our study incorporates numerical simulations and experimental data to assess the extent of discrepancies between these models.ResultsOur findings show that the poroelastic model predicts seismic wave velocities with up to a 6% difference compared to the elastic model. While minimal differences are observed in field-scale surveys, the discrepancies become more significant in pilot plant experiments and ultrasonic measurements as frequency increases. These results highlight the influence of poroelastic effects, which are not captured adequately by elastic models at higher frequencies.DiscussionThe observed frequency-dependent discrepancies suggest that elastic models may be insufficient for high-frequency seismic applications. This underscores the need for improved methodologies that integrate poroelastic effects to enhance the scalability of laboratory findings to field conditions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2025.1561168/fullfroward seismic modelingseismic monitoringloosely deposited sandsporoelastic effectsfrequency-dependent
spellingShingle Tengfei Deng
Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
Frontiers in Earth Science
froward seismic modeling
seismic monitoring
loosely deposited sands
poroelastic effects
frequency-dependent
title Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
title_full Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
title_fullStr Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
title_full_unstemmed Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
title_short Poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
title_sort poroelastic effects on seismic monitoring in partially saturated loosely deposited sands
topic froward seismic modeling
seismic monitoring
loosely deposited sands
poroelastic effects
frequency-dependent
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2025.1561168/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tengfeideng poroelasticeffectsonseismicmonitoringinpartiallysaturatedlooselydepositedsands