Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the psychometrics of the Dutch version of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2). By this, an international recognized instrument to screen symptoms of post-traumatic stress (PTSS) in children and adolescents according to the Diagnostic a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lieke H. Kooij, Irma M. Hein, Cedric Sachser, Samantha Bouwmeester, Madelief Bosse, Ramón J. L. Lindauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20008066.2025.2450985
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592231663403008
author Lieke H. Kooij
Irma M. Hein
Cedric Sachser
Samantha Bouwmeester
Madelief Bosse
Ramón J. L. Lindauer
author_facet Lieke H. Kooij
Irma M. Hein
Cedric Sachser
Samantha Bouwmeester
Madelief Bosse
Ramón J. L. Lindauer
author_sort Lieke H. Kooij
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the psychometrics of the Dutch version of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2). By this, an international recognized instrument to screen symptoms of post-traumatic stress (PTSS) in children and adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) becomes available for Dutch youth.Procedure and Method: Based on the validated CATS-2 we established the Dutch version, named the KJTS. A total of 587 children and adolescent, age 7–21, and 658 caregivers referred to mental health care services in Amsterdam was included in the study to examine psychometric properties. The construct was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Furthermore reliability, convergent-divergent patterns and diagnostic test accuracy were examined.Results: The underlying DSM-5 factor structure with four symptom clusters (re-experiencing, avoidance, negative alterations in mood and cognitions, hyperarousal) was supported by CFA showing a good fit for the selfreport (CFI = .95, TLI = .94), and an acceptable fit for the caregiver report (CFI = .90, TLI = .89). The KJTS showed excellent reliability (alpha = .92) on both selfreport and caregiver report. The convergent-discriminant validity pattern showed medium to strong correlations with measures of internalization problems, such as anxiety and affective problems (r = .44–.72) and low to medium correlations with externalizing symptoms (r = .21–.36). The ROC-curve analysis has proven a good accuracy (AUC = .81; n = 106).Discussion and conclusion: This study demonstrates the psychometric accuracy of the KJTS in a Dutch clinical population. The KJTS reflects adequately the dimensionality of PTSD as described in the DSM-5, with a good fit for selfreports, an acceptable fit for caregiver reports, excellent reliability and sufficient validity. Limitations are described. The outcomes support the use of the KJTS in research and clinical practice for screening and monitoring of PTSS.
format Article
id doaj-art-9fee8b41100847b0819c7edf3db38c64
institution Kabale University
issn 2000-8066
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series European Journal of Psychotraumatology
spelling doaj-art-9fee8b41100847b0819c7edf3db38c642025-01-21T12:08:28ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology2000-80662025-12-0116110.1080/20008066.2025.2450985Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma ScreenerLieke H. Kooij0Irma M. Hein1Cedric Sachser2Samantha Bouwmeester3Madelief Bosse4Ramón J. L. Lindauer5Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, GermanyOut of the BoxPlot, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsObjective: The aim of this study is to investigate the psychometrics of the Dutch version of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2). By this, an international recognized instrument to screen symptoms of post-traumatic stress (PTSS) in children and adolescents according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5) becomes available for Dutch youth.Procedure and Method: Based on the validated CATS-2 we established the Dutch version, named the KJTS. A total of 587 children and adolescent, age 7–21, and 658 caregivers referred to mental health care services in Amsterdam was included in the study to examine psychometric properties. The construct was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Furthermore reliability, convergent-divergent patterns and diagnostic test accuracy were examined.Results: The underlying DSM-5 factor structure with four symptom clusters (re-experiencing, avoidance, negative alterations in mood and cognitions, hyperarousal) was supported by CFA showing a good fit for the selfreport (CFI = .95, TLI = .94), and an acceptable fit for the caregiver report (CFI = .90, TLI = .89). The KJTS showed excellent reliability (alpha = .92) on both selfreport and caregiver report. The convergent-discriminant validity pattern showed medium to strong correlations with measures of internalization problems, such as anxiety and affective problems (r = .44–.72) and low to medium correlations with externalizing symptoms (r = .21–.36). The ROC-curve analysis has proven a good accuracy (AUC = .81; n = 106).Discussion and conclusion: This study demonstrates the psychometric accuracy of the KJTS in a Dutch clinical population. The KJTS reflects adequately the dimensionality of PTSD as described in the DSM-5, with a good fit for selfreports, an acceptable fit for caregiver reports, excellent reliability and sufficient validity. Limitations are described. The outcomes support the use of the KJTS in research and clinical practice for screening and monitoring of PTSS.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20008066.2025.2450985Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2)PTSD childrenadolescentspsychometricsKJTSEvaluación de traumatismos en niños y adolescentes
spellingShingle Lieke H. Kooij
Irma M. Hein
Cedric Sachser
Samantha Bouwmeester
Madelief Bosse
Ramón J. L. Lindauer
Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2)
PTSD children
adolescents
psychometrics
KJTS
Evaluación de traumatismos en niños y adolescentes
title Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener
title_full Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener
title_fullStr Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener
title_short Psychometric accuracy of the Dutch Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener
title_sort psychometric accuracy of the dutch child and adolescent trauma screener
topic Child and Adolescent Trauma Screener (CATS-2)
PTSD children
adolescents
psychometrics
KJTS
Evaluación de traumatismos en niños y adolescentes
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20008066.2025.2450985
work_keys_str_mv AT liekehkooij psychometricaccuracyofthedutchchildandadolescenttraumascreener
AT irmamhein psychometricaccuracyofthedutchchildandadolescenttraumascreener
AT cedricsachser psychometricaccuracyofthedutchchildandadolescenttraumascreener
AT samanthabouwmeester psychometricaccuracyofthedutchchildandadolescenttraumascreener
AT madeliefbosse psychometricaccuracyofthedutchchildandadolescenttraumascreener
AT ramonjllindauer psychometricaccuracyofthedutchchildandadolescenttraumascreener