Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes

The provision of feedback remains one of the most potent instructional interventions within second language acquisition, yet the affective mechanisms underlying its efficacy are still poorly understood. This study investigates how feedback type, specifically AI-generated versus teacher-provided feed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amin Shahini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-12-01
Series:Ampersand
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039025000190
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225348671078400
author Amin Shahini
author_facet Amin Shahini
author_sort Amin Shahini
collection DOAJ
description The provision of feedback remains one of the most potent instructional interventions within second language acquisition, yet the affective mechanisms underlying its efficacy are still poorly understood. This study investigates how feedback type, specifically AI-generated versus teacher-provided feedback, interacts with learners' Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) and Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE) to influence language proficiency development. Adopting a quasi-experimental design with a purely quantitative methodological orientation, the research recruited 63 intermediate-level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners and assigned them randomly to either an AI feedback group or a teacher feedback group. Participants completed five academic writing and speaking tasks over six weeks, each followed by an immediate feedback and revision cycle. Measurements included pre- and post-intervention language proficiency assessments, alongside the administration of validated scales for TEI and FLE. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and mediated pathways between variables. Results revealed that TEI significantly predicted learners' levels of FLE, which, in turn, significantly mediated the relationship between feedback type and language proficiency improvement. Teacher feedback demonstrated a stronger positive effect on FLE compared to AI feedback. The SEM model exhibited excellent fit indices, confirming the robustness of the hypothesized structure. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional dimensions in feedback practices, suggesting that optimal language learning outcomes arise not merely from the cognitive correction of errors but also from the emotional resonance that feedback generates. Implications are discussed for pedagogical practices, AI design in language education, and the broader field of affective second language acquisition research.
format Article
id doaj-art-9fdbbfacf9604b649fd3ae37a9e77e13
institution Kabale University
issn 2215-0390
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ampersand
spelling doaj-art-9fdbbfacf9604b649fd3ae37a9e77e132025-08-25T04:14:28ZengElsevierAmpersand2215-03902025-12-011510023510.1016/j.amper.2025.100235Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomesAmin Shahini0Department of English Language Teaching, Go. C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, IranThe provision of feedback remains one of the most potent instructional interventions within second language acquisition, yet the affective mechanisms underlying its efficacy are still poorly understood. This study investigates how feedback type, specifically AI-generated versus teacher-provided feedback, interacts with learners' Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEI) and Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE) to influence language proficiency development. Adopting a quasi-experimental design with a purely quantitative methodological orientation, the research recruited 63 intermediate-level English as a Second Language (ESL) learners and assigned them randomly to either an AI feedback group or a teacher feedback group. Participants completed five academic writing and speaking tasks over six weeks, each followed by an immediate feedback and revision cycle. Measurements included pre- and post-intervention language proficiency assessments, alongside the administration of validated scales for TEI and FLE. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine both direct and mediated pathways between variables. Results revealed that TEI significantly predicted learners' levels of FLE, which, in turn, significantly mediated the relationship between feedback type and language proficiency improvement. Teacher feedback demonstrated a stronger positive effect on FLE compared to AI feedback. The SEM model exhibited excellent fit indices, confirming the robustness of the hypothesized structure. These findings underscore the importance of addressing emotional dimensions in feedback practices, suggesting that optimal language learning outcomes arise not merely from the cognitive correction of errors but also from the emotional resonance that feedback generates. Implications are discussed for pedagogical practices, AI design in language education, and the broader field of affective second language acquisition research.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039025000190AIFLETEIFeedback
spellingShingle Amin Shahini
Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
Ampersand
AI
FLE
TEI
Feedback
title Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
title_full Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
title_fullStr Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
title_short Emotional dimensions of feedback: How AI and human responses shape ESL learning outcomes
title_sort emotional dimensions of feedback how ai and human responses shape esl learning outcomes
topic AI
FLE
TEI
Feedback
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039025000190
work_keys_str_mv AT aminshahini emotionaldimensionsoffeedbackhowaiandhumanresponsesshapeesllearningoutcomes