Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production

Background: The rapid production of gas during the colonic fermentation of highly soluble fermentable fibres may cause unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms. In vivo feeding studies are often used to assess symptomatic response to fibres; however, in vitro fermentation studies are quicker, cheaper, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catriona L. Thomson, Ada L. Garcia, Christine A. Edwards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/91/1/65
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850091198269620224
author Catriona L. Thomson
Ada L. Garcia
Christine A. Edwards
author_facet Catriona L. Thomson
Ada L. Garcia
Christine A. Edwards
author_sort Catriona L. Thomson
collection DOAJ
description Background: The rapid production of gas during the colonic fermentation of highly soluble fermentable fibres may cause unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms. In vivo feeding studies are often used to assess symptomatic response to fibres; however, in vitro fermentation studies are quicker, cheaper, and more reproducible. The aim of this study was to validate an in vitro colonic fermentation model of gas production against in vivo experiences of symptoms following inulin consumption. Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 21, 18–65 y/o, M/F) provided a stool sample used to inoculate an in vitro colonic fermentation model. Fermentation bottles containing faecal slurry, a fermentation medium, and a fibre substrate (inulin) were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in a shaking water bath. The total gas production (mL) over 24 h (minus control) was measured. Each stool donor added 15 g inulin to a low-fibre diet and recorded experiences of gastrointestinal symptoms for 48h. In vitro gas production and in vivo symptom experience were compared for each donor following tertile classification. Low in vitro gas production was classed as <45mL (<1st quartile of dataset), medium as 45–78 mL (1st quartile–3rd quartile), and high as >78 mL (>3rd quartile). In vivo symptom response was classed as low if symptoms were mild and/or short-lived (<1 h duration); medium if moderate and/or prolonged (1 h); and high when abdominal pain or multiple prolonged (3 h) symptoms occurred. Results: In vitro gas production was high in six cases (29%); medium in ten (48%); and low in five (24%). Symptom experience was high in seven cases (33%); medium in five (24%); and low in nine (43%). The same classification occurred in 57% of cases and classification into adjacent categories occurred in 43%; no complete misclassification occurred. Agreement between the methods was fair: weighted kappa = 0.378 (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Discussion: The level of agreement between the in vitro model of gas production and in vivo symptom reports, and the absence of any cases of complete misclassification, is promising. This simple in vitro batch-fermentation model may be used in future to screen fibres for their potential impact on gastrointestinal symptoms. This will help develop strategies to increase fibre consumption generally and optimise their use in food reformulation.
format Article
id doaj-art-9fbb66476edf41948609d62589a4474f
institution DOAJ
issn 2504-3900
language English
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Proceedings
spelling doaj-art-9fbb66476edf41948609d62589a4474f2025-08-20T02:42:25ZengMDPI AGProceedings2504-39002023-11-019116510.3390/proceedings2023091065Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas ProductionCatriona L. Thomson0Ada L. Garcia1Christine A. Edwards2Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK,Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK,Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK,Background: The rapid production of gas during the colonic fermentation of highly soluble fermentable fibres may cause unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms. In vivo feeding studies are often used to assess symptomatic response to fibres; however, in vitro fermentation studies are quicker, cheaper, and more reproducible. The aim of this study was to validate an in vitro colonic fermentation model of gas production against in vivo experiences of symptoms following inulin consumption. Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 21, 18–65 y/o, M/F) provided a stool sample used to inoculate an in vitro colonic fermentation model. Fermentation bottles containing faecal slurry, a fermentation medium, and a fibre substrate (inulin) were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in a shaking water bath. The total gas production (mL) over 24 h (minus control) was measured. Each stool donor added 15 g inulin to a low-fibre diet and recorded experiences of gastrointestinal symptoms for 48h. In vitro gas production and in vivo symptom experience were compared for each donor following tertile classification. Low in vitro gas production was classed as <45mL (<1st quartile of dataset), medium as 45–78 mL (1st quartile–3rd quartile), and high as >78 mL (>3rd quartile). In vivo symptom response was classed as low if symptoms were mild and/or short-lived (<1 h duration); medium if moderate and/or prolonged (1 h); and high when abdominal pain or multiple prolonged (3 h) symptoms occurred. Results: In vitro gas production was high in six cases (29%); medium in ten (48%); and low in five (24%). Symptom experience was high in seven cases (33%); medium in five (24%); and low in nine (43%). The same classification occurred in 57% of cases and classification into adjacent categories occurred in 43%; no complete misclassification occurred. Agreement between the methods was fair: weighted kappa = 0.378 (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Discussion: The level of agreement between the in vitro model of gas production and in vivo symptom reports, and the absence of any cases of complete misclassification, is promising. This simple in vitro batch-fermentation model may be used in future to screen fibres for their potential impact on gastrointestinal symptoms. This will help develop strategies to increase fibre consumption generally and optimise their use in food reformulation.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/91/1/65dietary fibrein vitro fermentationgastrointestinal symptoms
spellingShingle Catriona L. Thomson
Ada L. Garcia
Christine A. Edwards
Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production
Proceedings
dietary fibre
in vitro fermentation
gastrointestinal symptoms
title Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production
title_full Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production
title_fullStr Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production
title_short Validation of an In Vitro Fermentation Model of Colonic Gas Production
title_sort validation of an in vitro fermentation model of colonic gas production
topic dietary fibre
in vitro fermentation
gastrointestinal symptoms
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/91/1/65
work_keys_str_mv AT catrionalthomson validationofaninvitrofermentationmodelofcolonicgasproduction
AT adalgarcia validationofaninvitrofermentationmodelofcolonicgasproduction
AT christineaedwards validationofaninvitrofermentationmodelofcolonicgasproduction