ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON

Abstract: We employed a 3‐level hierarchical approach to study roosting habitat of Rio Grande wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) to increase understanding of habitat needs and provide information for managing forested landscapes in the Pacific Northwest. Roost locations (n = 375) were obt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas W. Keegan, John A. Crawford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005-01-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00316.x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849735390586470400
author Thomas W. Keegan
John A. Crawford
author_facet Thomas W. Keegan
John A. Crawford
author_sort Thomas W. Keegan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract: We employed a 3‐level hierarchical approach to study roosting habitat of Rio Grande wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) to increase understanding of habitat needs and provide information for managing forested landscapes in the Pacific Northwest. Roost locations (n = 375) were obtained year‐round (Feb 1989–Jan 1991) from 76 radiomarked females that were part of a recently introduced population (<10 years) in southwestern Oregon. At the largest scale, adult females selected dense, young, mixed‐conifer stands and hardwood‐conifer woodlands (P < 0.05); 58% of roosts occurred in these cover types. Females with broods also selected hardwood‐conifer woodlands (P < 0.05), which accounted for 35% of their roost locations. At the forest stand scale, turkeys typically roosted in trees as large as or larger than others available in the stand. The finest scale was individual roost trees, which averaged 106 years old, 50 cm diameter at breast height (dbh), and 33 m tall. Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) was the only species used more often than expected for roosting (P < 0.05), comprising 77% of roost trees. To accommodate wild turkey roost habitat needs, timber management plans must include an appropriate juxtaposition and balance of age classes of mixed‐conifer stands over time and in relation to other habitats used by wild turkeys.
format Article
id doaj-art-9fba3cf69e104b079e0508bc7fc0263d
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-9fba3cf69e104b079e0508bc7fc0263d2025-08-20T03:07:34ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402005-01-012005S125325910.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00316.xROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGONThomas W. Keegan0John A. Crawford1Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Nash Hall 104Oregon State UniversityCorvallisOR97331USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Nash Hall 104Oregon State UniversityCorvallisOR97331USAAbstract: We employed a 3‐level hierarchical approach to study roosting habitat of Rio Grande wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) to increase understanding of habitat needs and provide information for managing forested landscapes in the Pacific Northwest. Roost locations (n = 375) were obtained year‐round (Feb 1989–Jan 1991) from 76 radiomarked females that were part of a recently introduced population (<10 years) in southwestern Oregon. At the largest scale, adult females selected dense, young, mixed‐conifer stands and hardwood‐conifer woodlands (P < 0.05); 58% of roosts occurred in these cover types. Females with broods also selected hardwood‐conifer woodlands (P < 0.05), which accounted for 35% of their roost locations. At the forest stand scale, turkeys typically roosted in trees as large as or larger than others available in the stand. The finest scale was individual roost trees, which averaged 106 years old, 50 cm diameter at breast height (dbh), and 33 m tall. Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) was the only species used more often than expected for roosting (P < 0.05), comprising 77% of roost trees. To accommodate wild turkey roost habitat needs, timber management plans must include an appropriate juxtaposition and balance of age classes of mixed‐conifer stands over time and in relation to other habitats used by wild turkeys.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00316.xMeleagris gallopavo intermediaOregonradiotelemetryRio Grande wild turkeyroost habitatroost trees
spellingShingle Thomas W. Keegan
John A. Crawford
ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Meleagris gallopavo intermedia
Oregon
radiotelemetry
Rio Grande wild turkey
roost habitat
roost trees
title ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON
title_full ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON
title_fullStr ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON
title_full_unstemmed ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON
title_short ROOST HABITAT SELECTION BY RIO GRANDE TURKEYS IN OREGON
title_sort roost habitat selection by rio grande turkeys in oregon
topic Meleagris gallopavo intermedia
Oregon
radiotelemetry
Rio Grande wild turkey
roost habitat
roost trees
url https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2328-5540.2005.tb00316.x
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaswkeegan roosthabitatselectionbyriograndeturkeysinoregon
AT johnacrawford roosthabitatselectionbyriograndeturkeysinoregon