Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis

Abstract Quality of Life (QoL) in urban environments represents people’s well-being and is influenced by various factors. This paper introduces an innovative approach to promote urban equity by integrating spatial analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The proposed method focuses mainly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Zhalehdoost, Mohammad Taleai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05468-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849769028352999424
author Alireza Zhalehdoost
Mohammad Taleai
author_facet Alireza Zhalehdoost
Mohammad Taleai
author_sort Alireza Zhalehdoost
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Quality of Life (QoL) in urban environments represents people’s well-being and is influenced by various factors. This paper introduces an innovative approach to promote urban equity by integrating spatial analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The proposed method focuses mainly on accessibility to urban facilities and environmental health factors. In this research, data fusion techniques were utilized to generate criteria maps for urban air pollution and heat islands, while factor analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and entropy were employed to provide a comprehensive assessment of equity related to these environmental factors in the case study area. Expert opinions, collected through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best–Worst Method (BWM), were refined using Dempster–Shafer theory to adjust the weights assigned to each evaluation criterion. The results highlight that access to educational facilities and green spaces significantly impacts urban equity, with respective weights of 0.189 and 0.149. Air pollution was also identified as a critical factor, with a weight of 0.152. These findings underscore the potential of this integrated approach in assessing urban livability, particularly in Tehran, Iran.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f98281bb9e94daca9d94de2af325104
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-9f98281bb9e94daca9d94de2af3251042025-08-20T03:03:36ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115112010.1038/s41598-025-05468-1Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysisAlireza Zhalehdoost0Mohammad Taleai1GIS Department, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of TechnologyGIS Department, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of TechnologyAbstract Quality of Life (QoL) in urban environments represents people’s well-being and is influenced by various factors. This paper introduces an innovative approach to promote urban equity by integrating spatial analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The proposed method focuses mainly on accessibility to urban facilities and environmental health factors. In this research, data fusion techniques were utilized to generate criteria maps for urban air pollution and heat islands, while factor analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and entropy were employed to provide a comprehensive assessment of equity related to these environmental factors in the case study area. Expert opinions, collected through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Best–Worst Method (BWM), were refined using Dempster–Shafer theory to adjust the weights assigned to each evaluation criterion. The results highlight that access to educational facilities and green spaces significantly impacts urban equity, with respective weights of 0.189 and 0.149. Air pollution was also identified as a critical factor, with a weight of 0.152. These findings underscore the potential of this integrated approach in assessing urban livability, particularly in Tehran, Iran.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05468-1Urban quality of lifePrincipal component analysisAnalytic hierarchy processBest–Worst methodDempster–Shafer theory
spellingShingle Alireza Zhalehdoost
Mohammad Taleai
Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
Scientific Reports
Urban quality of life
Principal component analysis
Analytic hierarchy process
Best–Worst method
Dempster–Shafer theory
title Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
title_full Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
title_fullStr Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
title_short Enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
title_sort enhancing urban quality of life evaluation using spatial multi criteria analysis
topic Urban quality of life
Principal component analysis
Analytic hierarchy process
Best–Worst method
Dempster–Shafer theory
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05468-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezazhalehdoost enhancingurbanqualityoflifeevaluationusingspatialmulticriteriaanalysis
AT mohammadtaleai enhancingurbanqualityoflifeevaluationusingspatialmulticriteriaanalysis