Scientific Justification and Policy Recommendations to the US Food and Drug Administration for Waiving Comparative Efficacy Studies
This detailed review looks at how the rules for proving biosimilarity are changing, mainly focusing on the requirements for comparative efficacy studies (CESs). As analytical technologies progress, mounting evidence suggests that when we establish robust analytical similarity and pharmacokinetic equ...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Sarfaraz K. Niazi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Pharmaceuticals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/6/779 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The regulation on the use of supplements for weight control: Case studies from Australia, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom
by: Saiya Whitney Dawson, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Patient-reported outcome claims in European and United States orphan drug approvals
by: Szymon Jarosławski, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
N-nitrosamine risk assessment in pharmaceuticals: Where are we from a regulatory point of view in 2025?
by: Yue Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01) -
ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGNING OF CLINICAL TRIALS
by: O. S. Kobyakova, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Use of real-world data for decision making in Canada and United Kingdom
by: P. A. Mukhortova, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)