Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations

In this study, we aimed to investigate genetic differences between estivated Phassalis and hibernated Termessos native B. terrestris populations based on 20 microsatellite loci and two mtDNA gene regions (COI and cytb). The mean number of allele per locus, observed heterozigosity and inbreeding coef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahar Argun Karslı, Fehmi Gürel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hasan Eleroğlu 2020-02-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/3061
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850241025761607680
author Bahar Argun Karslı
Fehmi Gürel
author_facet Bahar Argun Karslı
Fehmi Gürel
author_sort Bahar Argun Karslı
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we aimed to investigate genetic differences between estivated Phassalis and hibernated Termessos native B. terrestris populations based on 20 microsatellite loci and two mtDNA gene regions (COI and cytb). The mean number of allele per locus, observed heterozigosity and inbreeding coefficients were determined 12.00 and 11.00, 0.68 and 0.65, 0.22 and 0.26 in Termessos and Phassalis populations, respectively. Pairwise FST value was calculated as 0.023 by using 20 microsatellite loci. According to the mtDNA COI gene region, all samples in both two populations were included in a single haplotype (Haplotype B). Four different haplotypes (Haplotypes 1-4) were determined according to the mtDNA cytb gene region. Pairwise FST value was calculated as 0.0013 according to the mtDNA cytb gene region. There were no significant differences between these two natural B. terrestris populations in terms of the 20 microsatellite and two mtDNA loci examined. According to results, life cycle differences of different native B. terrestris population are probably determined by environmental factors (photoperiod, temperature, flora, moisture, altitude etc.) rather than genetic influences.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f61477f27764d63bfee448226db26d7
institution OA Journals
issn 2148-127X
language English
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Hasan Eleroğlu
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
spelling doaj-art-9f61477f27764d63bfee448226db26d72025-08-20T02:00:42ZengHasan EleroğluTurkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2020-02-018237237910.24925/turjaf.v8i2.372-379.30611524Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) PopulationsBahar Argun Karslı0Fehmi Gürel1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, 07070 AntalyaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, 07070 AntalyaIn this study, we aimed to investigate genetic differences between estivated Phassalis and hibernated Termessos native B. terrestris populations based on 20 microsatellite loci and two mtDNA gene regions (COI and cytb). The mean number of allele per locus, observed heterozigosity and inbreeding coefficients were determined 12.00 and 11.00, 0.68 and 0.65, 0.22 and 0.26 in Termessos and Phassalis populations, respectively. Pairwise FST value was calculated as 0.023 by using 20 microsatellite loci. According to the mtDNA COI gene region, all samples in both two populations were included in a single haplotype (Haplotype B). Four different haplotypes (Haplotypes 1-4) were determined according to the mtDNA cytb gene region. Pairwise FST value was calculated as 0.0013 according to the mtDNA cytb gene region. There were no significant differences between these two natural B. terrestris populations in terms of the 20 microsatellite and two mtDNA loci examined. According to results, life cycle differences of different native B. terrestris population are probably determined by environmental factors (photoperiod, temperature, flora, moisture, altitude etc.) rather than genetic influences.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/3061bombus arısıdiyapozgenetik farklıklarhibernasyongenetik farklıklar
spellingShingle Bahar Argun Karslı
Fehmi Gürel
Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations
Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
bombus arısı
diyapoz
genetik farklıklar
hibernasyon
genetik farklıklar
title Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations
title_full Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations
title_fullStr Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations
title_short Comparison of Genetic Structure Using Molecular Markers in Estivated and Hibernated Native Bombus terrestris (L.) Populations
title_sort comparison of genetic structure using molecular markers in estivated and hibernated native bombus terrestris l populations
topic bombus arısı
diyapoz
genetik farklıklar
hibernasyon
genetik farklıklar
url http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/3061
work_keys_str_mv AT baharargunkarslı comparisonofgeneticstructureusingmolecularmarkersinestivatedandhibernatednativebombusterrestrislpopulations
AT fehmigurel comparisonofgeneticstructureusingmolecularmarkersinestivatedandhibernatednativebombusterrestrislpopulations