L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data

This study examines the role of the use of the L1 in EFL classes from the perspective of EFL learners. The triangulated data were collected using class observations, focus group semi-structured interviews and the learners’ written reports of their perceptions and attitudes in a purposedesigned quest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa’d, Zohre Qadermazi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana 2015-06-01
Series:Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/147
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849324549982650368
author Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa’d
Zohre Qadermazi
author_facet Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa’d
Zohre Qadermazi
author_sort Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa’d
collection DOAJ
description This study examines the role of the use of the L1 in EFL classes from the perspective of EFL learners. The triangulated data were collected using class observations, focus group semi-structured interviews and the learners’ written reports of their perceptions and attitudes in a purposedesigned questionnaire. The participants consisted of sixty male Iranian EFL learners who constituted three classes. The results indicated a strong tendency among the participants toward L1 and its positive effects on language learning; while only a minority of the learners favoured an Englishonly policy, the majority supported the judicious, limited and occasional use of the L1, particularly on the part of the teacher. The participants mentioned the advantages as well as the disadvantages of the use/non-use of the L1. While the major advantage and the main purpose of L1 use was said to be the clarification and intelligibility of instructions, grammatical and lexical items, the main advantages of avoiding it were stated as being the improvement of speaking and listening skills, maximizing learners’ exposure to English and their becoming accustomed to it. The study concludes that, overall and in line with the majority of the previous research studies, a judicious, occasional and limited use of the L1 is a better approach to take in EFL classes than to include or exclude it totally. In conclusion, a reexamination of the English-only policy and a reconsideration of the role of the L1 are recommended. Finally, the commonly held assumption that L1 is a hindrance and an impediment to the learners’ language learning is challenged.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f55d09fbe384fdebca2d01c0c8f7c37
institution Kabale University
issn 1855-9719
2232-2647
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher University of Ljubljana
record_format Article
series Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal
spelling doaj-art-9f55d09fbe384fdebca2d01c0c8f7c372025-08-20T03:48:41ZengUniversity of LjubljanaCenter for Educational Policy Studies Journal1855-97192232-26472015-06-0152L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated DataSeyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa’dZohre QadermaziThis study examines the role of the use of the L1 in EFL classes from the perspective of EFL learners. The triangulated data were collected using class observations, focus group semi-structured interviews and the learners’ written reports of their perceptions and attitudes in a purposedesigned questionnaire. The participants consisted of sixty male Iranian EFL learners who constituted three classes. The results indicated a strong tendency among the participants toward L1 and its positive effects on language learning; while only a minority of the learners favoured an Englishonly policy, the majority supported the judicious, limited and occasional use of the L1, particularly on the part of the teacher. The participants mentioned the advantages as well as the disadvantages of the use/non-use of the L1. While the major advantage and the main purpose of L1 use was said to be the clarification and intelligibility of instructions, grammatical and lexical items, the main advantages of avoiding it were stated as being the improvement of speaking and listening skills, maximizing learners’ exposure to English and their becoming accustomed to it. The study concludes that, overall and in line with the majority of the previous research studies, a judicious, occasional and limited use of the L1 is a better approach to take in EFL classes than to include or exclude it totally. In conclusion, a reexamination of the English-only policy and a reconsideration of the role of the L1 are recommended. Finally, the commonly held assumption that L1 is a hindrance and an impediment to the learners’ language learning is challenged.https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/147EFL ClassesEFL LearnersInterviewL1 useObservationPerceptions
spellingShingle Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa’d
Zohre Qadermazi
L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data
Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal
EFL Classes
EFL Learners
Interview
L1 use
Observation
Perceptions
title L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data
title_full L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data
title_fullStr L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data
title_full_unstemmed L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data
title_short L1 Use in EFL Classes with English-only Policy: Insights from Triangulated Data
title_sort l1 use in efl classes with english only policy insights from triangulated data
topic EFL Classes
EFL Learners
Interview
L1 use
Observation
Perceptions
url https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/147
work_keys_str_mv AT seyyedhatamtamimisad l1useineflclasseswithenglishonlypolicyinsightsfromtriangulateddata
AT zohreqadermazi l1useineflclasseswithenglishonlypolicyinsightsfromtriangulateddata