Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test

Introduction: Chronic cough is a common symptom in pulmonology outpatient clinics, often associated with lung conditions, though extrapulmonary causes can also be responsible. This study aimed to detect bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and cough-variant asthma using a methacholine bronchial provocati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esra Arslan Aksu, Oğuz Uzun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Airlangga 2025-01-01
Series:Jurnal Respirasi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JR/article/view/60174
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849716977326620672
author Esra Arslan Aksu
Oğuz Uzun
author_facet Esra Arslan Aksu
Oğuz Uzun
author_sort Esra Arslan Aksu
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Chronic cough is a common symptom in pulmonology outpatient clinics, often associated with lung conditions, though extrapulmonary causes can also be responsible. This study aimed to detect bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and cough-variant asthma using a methacholine bronchial provocation test (BPT) in patients with chronic cough for whom standard diagnostic procedures could not identify a cause. Methods: This prospective study evaluated patients admitted to the clinic who presented with chronic coughs over one year. A BPT was performed on patients for whom standard diagnostic procedures failed to identify a cause, and this selected group was included in this study. Results: This study included a total of 40 patients who were examined for chronic cough symptoms without an identifiable etiology. The BPT was negative (PD20 >16 mg/mL) in 30 patients (75%) and positive in 10 patients (25%). Among the patients with negative BPT results, 13 (43.3%) had no identifiable cause for their cough. Conclusion: This study differs from others by focusing on a selected group of patients with chronic coughs for whom the etiology could not be determined through standard diagnostic procedures. The BPT was performed alongside typical diagnostic tests, and no diagnoses were made in the included patients. Tests identified BHR and cough-variant asthma in 25% of these patients, suggesting that BPT is a valuable tool in diagnosing chronic cough when conventional methods fail.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f42887f15ec4059b7ef28c652733faa
institution DOAJ
issn 2407-0831
2621-8372
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Universitas Airlangga
record_format Article
series Jurnal Respirasi
spelling doaj-art-9f42887f15ec4059b7ef28c652733faa2025-08-20T03:12:48ZengUniversitas AirlanggaJurnal Respirasi2407-08312621-83722025-01-0111115https://doi.org/10.20473/jr.v11-I.1.2025.1-5Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation TestEsra Arslan Aksu0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0448-1801Oğuz Uzun1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-4198Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Samsun University, Samsun, Turkey.Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.Introduction: Chronic cough is a common symptom in pulmonology outpatient clinics, often associated with lung conditions, though extrapulmonary causes can also be responsible. This study aimed to detect bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and cough-variant asthma using a methacholine bronchial provocation test (BPT) in patients with chronic cough for whom standard diagnostic procedures could not identify a cause. Methods: This prospective study evaluated patients admitted to the clinic who presented with chronic coughs over one year. A BPT was performed on patients for whom standard diagnostic procedures failed to identify a cause, and this selected group was included in this study. Results: This study included a total of 40 patients who were examined for chronic cough symptoms without an identifiable etiology. The BPT was negative (PD20 >16 mg/mL) in 30 patients (75%) and positive in 10 patients (25%). Among the patients with negative BPT results, 13 (43.3%) had no identifiable cause for their cough. Conclusion: This study differs from others by focusing on a selected group of patients with chronic coughs for whom the etiology could not be determined through standard diagnostic procedures. The BPT was performed alongside typical diagnostic tests, and no diagnoses were made in the included patients. Tests identified BHR and cough-variant asthma in 25% of these patients, suggesting that BPT is a valuable tool in diagnosing chronic cough when conventional methods fail.https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JR/article/view/60174asthmabronchial hyperreactivitybronchial provocation testchronic coughchronic respiratory diseases
spellingShingle Esra Arslan Aksu
Oğuz Uzun
Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test
Jurnal Respirasi
asthma
bronchial hyperreactivity
bronchial provocation test
chronic cough
chronic respiratory diseases
title Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test
title_full Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test
title_fullStr Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test
title_full_unstemmed Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test
title_short Determining Chronic Cough Using the Methacholine Bronchial Provocation Test
title_sort determining chronic cough using the methacholine bronchial provocation test
topic asthma
bronchial hyperreactivity
bronchial provocation test
chronic cough
chronic respiratory diseases
url https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JR/article/view/60174
work_keys_str_mv AT esraarslanaksu determiningchroniccoughusingthemethacholinebronchialprovocationtest
AT oguzuzun determiningchroniccoughusingthemethacholinebronchialprovocationtest