What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers

Abstract Background Paternalistic leadership is usually adopted by the presidents of universities. Presidents are responsible for the success or failure of the university operations. In addition, they are responsible for policy promotion as well. This thinking model significantly differs from the we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shen Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02595-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850207967929958400
author Shen Zhang
author_facet Shen Zhang
author_sort Shen Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Paternalistic leadership is usually adopted by the presidents of universities. Presidents are responsible for the success or failure of the university operations. In addition, they are responsible for policy promotion as well. This thinking model significantly differs from the western democratic view and it is worth discussing. The purpose of this study is to understand how paternalistic leadership (PL) affects peer leadership (PLD) and interactions among faculty members in universities. Methods The current study was conducted with the participation of faculty members working in universities in Beijing. In this respect, a total of 320 copies of questionnaire were distributed. After removing the invalid and incomplete ones, 283 copies were found as valid. In the end, 88% of the questionnaires were considered valid. Factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. In addition, a structural equation modeling was implemented to test the hypotheses. Findings The research results showed that a university leader with balanced benevolence, authoritarianism, and moral leadership can empower a peer leader teacher to exhibit goal oriented behaviors. These behaviors also help the promotion of team harmony. Secondly, a university leader with a paternalistic leadership style can improve PI among professional teachers. Additionally, the leader can make the peer leader establish positive interaction. Conclusion The results of the study revealed that a leader in the teacher team with higher PLD characteristics can result in better peer interaction (PI) among teachers. Specific recommendations are provided to address the potential challenges university faculty may face in PIs, particularly in areas they perceive as having a poorer experience. It should be kept in mind that the power formed by university teams cannot be ignored to accomplish important tasks at the university and this power promotes the effectiveness of the university.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f4072c2c3eb442d8de98850b89cbb11
institution OA Journals
issn 2050-7283
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj-art-9f4072c2c3eb442d8de98850b89cbb112025-08-20T02:10:20ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832025-03-0113111510.1186/s40359-025-02595-2What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachersShen Zhang0School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua UniversityAbstract Background Paternalistic leadership is usually adopted by the presidents of universities. Presidents are responsible for the success or failure of the university operations. In addition, they are responsible for policy promotion as well. This thinking model significantly differs from the western democratic view and it is worth discussing. The purpose of this study is to understand how paternalistic leadership (PL) affects peer leadership (PLD) and interactions among faculty members in universities. Methods The current study was conducted with the participation of faculty members working in universities in Beijing. In this respect, a total of 320 copies of questionnaire were distributed. After removing the invalid and incomplete ones, 283 copies were found as valid. In the end, 88% of the questionnaires were considered valid. Factor analysis and reliability analysis were performed to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. In addition, a structural equation modeling was implemented to test the hypotheses. Findings The research results showed that a university leader with balanced benevolence, authoritarianism, and moral leadership can empower a peer leader teacher to exhibit goal oriented behaviors. These behaviors also help the promotion of team harmony. Secondly, a university leader with a paternalistic leadership style can improve PI among professional teachers. Additionally, the leader can make the peer leader establish positive interaction. Conclusion The results of the study revealed that a leader in the teacher team with higher PLD characteristics can result in better peer interaction (PI) among teachers. Specific recommendations are provided to address the potential challenges university faculty may face in PIs, particularly in areas they perceive as having a poorer experience. It should be kept in mind that the power formed by university teams cannot be ignored to accomplish important tasks at the university and this power promotes the effectiveness of the university.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02595-2Paternalistic leadershipPeer leadershipTeachersPeer interactionAuthoritarianism
spellingShingle Shen Zhang
What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
BMC Psychology
Paternalistic leadership
Peer leadership
Teachers
Peer interaction
Authoritarianism
title What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
title_full What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
title_fullStr What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
title_full_unstemmed What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
title_short What affects peer interaction in universities? Examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
title_sort what affects peer interaction in universities examining the effects of paternalistic leadership and peer leadership on peer interaction of teachers
topic Paternalistic leadership
Peer leadership
Teachers
Peer interaction
Authoritarianism
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02595-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shenzhang whataffectspeerinteractioninuniversitiesexaminingtheeffectsofpaternalisticleadershipandpeerleadershiponpeerinteractionofteachers