Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been widely used to treat distal radius fractures (DRFs) with higher satisfaction and cosmetic and economic advantages than the modified Henry approach. However, few studies have focused on MIPO and cohorts using the modified Henry appro...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/FJMD.FJMD_324 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850214857954033664 |
|---|---|
| author | Cheng-You Wang Chin-Hsien Wu Yen-Chun Chiu I-Ming Jou Yuan-Kun Tu Ching-Hou Ma |
| author_facet | Cheng-You Wang Chin-Hsien Wu Yen-Chun Chiu I-Ming Jou Yuan-Kun Tu Ching-Hou Ma |
| author_sort | Cheng-You Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background:
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been widely used to treat distal radius fractures (DRFs) with higher satisfaction and cosmetic and economic advantages than the modified Henry approach. However, few studies have focused on MIPO and cohorts using the modified Henry approach with pronator quadratus (PQ) sparing.
Objectives:
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes and complications of MIPO with those of the modified Henry approach with PQ sparing in the treatment of DRF.
Materials and Methods:
The study included 17 patients with DRF treated with MIPO (Group A) and 15 patients with DRF treated with the modified Henry approach with PQ sparing (Group B) between January 2016 and August 2019. Healing time, radiographic evaluation, range of motion, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and pain score were observed and compared between the two groups.
Results:
Intraoperative blood loss (65.2 ± 28.7 cc) and operative time (75.4 ± 16.5 min) was significantly more in Group A than in Group B (P < 0.05). In addition, Group A showed a worse supination angle after operation (82.9 ± 10.3) than Group B (90 ± 5.2). There were no significant differences in union time, other ranges of motion, grip strength, DASH score, pain score, or time to return to work between the two groups.
Conclusions:
MIPO for DRF was not superior to the modified Henry approach with PQ sparing. A few critical complications were observed in the MIPO group. Clinicians should select the appropriate surgical technique for the treatment of distal radial fractures. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9f3ff9c3112b4b4b98a6773254b22891 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2210-7940 2210-7959 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders |
| spelling | doaj-art-9f3ff9c3112b4b4b98a6773254b228912025-08-20T02:08:46ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsFormosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders2210-79402210-79592023-07-01143949910.4103/FJMD.FJMD_324Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort StudyCheng-You WangChin-Hsien WuYen-Chun ChiuI-Ming JouYuan-Kun TuChing-Hou MaBackground: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been widely used to treat distal radius fractures (DRFs) with higher satisfaction and cosmetic and economic advantages than the modified Henry approach. However, few studies have focused on MIPO and cohorts using the modified Henry approach with pronator quadratus (PQ) sparing. Objectives: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes and complications of MIPO with those of the modified Henry approach with PQ sparing in the treatment of DRF. Materials and Methods: The study included 17 patients with DRF treated with MIPO (Group A) and 15 patients with DRF treated with the modified Henry approach with PQ sparing (Group B) between January 2016 and August 2019. Healing time, radiographic evaluation, range of motion, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and pain score were observed and compared between the two groups. Results: Intraoperative blood loss (65.2 ± 28.7 cc) and operative time (75.4 ± 16.5 min) was significantly more in Group A than in Group B (P < 0.05). In addition, Group A showed a worse supination angle after operation (82.9 ± 10.3) than Group B (90 ± 5.2). There were no significant differences in union time, other ranges of motion, grip strength, DASH score, pain score, or time to return to work between the two groups. Conclusions: MIPO for DRF was not superior to the modified Henry approach with PQ sparing. A few critical complications were observed in the MIPO group. Clinicians should select the appropriate surgical technique for the treatment of distal radial fractures.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/FJMD.FJMD_324distal radius fractureminimally invasive plate osteosynthesisretrospective |
| spellingShingle | Cheng-You Wang Chin-Hsien Wu Yen-Chun Chiu I-Ming Jou Yuan-Kun Tu Ching-Hou Ma Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders distal radius fracture minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis retrospective |
| title | Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_full | Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_fullStr | Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_short | Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Distal Radius Fracture is not Superior to Modified Henry Approach with Pronator Quadratus Sparing: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
| title_sort | minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal radius fracture is not superior to modified henry approach with pronator quadratus sparing a retrospective cohort study |
| topic | distal radius fracture minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis retrospective |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/FJMD.FJMD_324 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chengyouwang minimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesisindistalradiusfractureisnotsuperiortomodifiedhenryapproachwithpronatorquadratussparingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chinhsienwu minimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesisindistalradiusfractureisnotsuperiortomodifiedhenryapproachwithpronatorquadratussparingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yenchunchiu minimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesisindistalradiusfractureisnotsuperiortomodifiedhenryapproachwithpronatorquadratussparingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT imingjou minimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesisindistalradiusfractureisnotsuperiortomodifiedhenryapproachwithpronatorquadratussparingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yuankuntu minimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesisindistalradiusfractureisnotsuperiortomodifiedhenryapproachwithpronatorquadratussparingaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chinghouma minimallyinvasiveplateosteosynthesisindistalradiusfractureisnotsuperiortomodifiedhenryapproachwithpronatorquadratussparingaretrospectivecohortstudy |