Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition which often leads to scars. The treatment of acne scars typically involves a multi-faceted approach, with microneedling and PRP therapy emerging as effective options for atrophic scars. While several studies have compared the effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G M Krithika, A S Sanjana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ADICHUNCHANAGIRI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Medical Sciences and Health
Online Access:https://jmsh.ac.in/articles/dermaroller-versus-platelet-rich-plasma-in-acne-scars-a-prospective-split-face-study
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850103097217515520
author G M Krithika
A S Sanjana
author_facet G M Krithika
A S Sanjana
author_sort G M Krithika
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition which often leads to scars. The treatment of acne scars typically involves a multi-faceted approach, with microneedling and PRP therapy emerging as effective options for atrophic scars. While several studies have compared the effects of microneedling alone versus microneedling combined with PRP, there is a lack of direct comparison between the individual efficacy of microneedling and PRP. This study aimed to address that gap. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of dermaroller versus PRP therapy in the same patient with acne scars. Materials and methods: A total of 25 patients were included in the study. Goodman and Baron quantitative acne scar grading system was employed for classification. Patients were treated with dermaroller on right side of face and intradermal PRP injections on left side of face. Response was assessed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months using a visual analog score (VAS). Results: The mean (SD) age of the study participants was 29.8 (5.2) years. Out of 25 patients, 52% (n=13) were males and 48% (n=12) were females. At the end of 4 sessions of microneedling on right cheek, 92% (n=23) had fair response and 8% (n=2) had poor response, whereas on left cheek, 80% (n=20) had good response and 20% (n=5) had excellent response post PRP and this difference was significantly different (p <0.001). Conclusion: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) yields superior outcomes compared to microneedling in improving atrophic acne scars.Top of Form Keywords: Acne scars, Platelet rich plasma, Microneedling
format Article
id doaj-art-9f331d59e79c4280b0bc4756ca74f547
institution DOAJ
issn 2394-9481
2394-949X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher ADICHUNCHANAGIRI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Sciences and Health
spelling doaj-art-9f331d59e79c4280b0bc4756ca74f5472025-08-20T02:39:37ZengADICHUNCHANAGIRI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCESJournal of Medical Sciences and Health2394-94812394-949X2025-04-01111919710.46347/jmsh.v11.i1.24.349Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face StudyG M KrithikaA S Sanjana Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common dermatological condition which often leads to scars. The treatment of acne scars typically involves a multi-faceted approach, with microneedling and PRP therapy emerging as effective options for atrophic scars. While several studies have compared the effects of microneedling alone versus microneedling combined with PRP, there is a lack of direct comparison between the individual efficacy of microneedling and PRP. This study aimed to address that gap. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of dermaroller versus PRP therapy in the same patient with acne scars. Materials and methods: A total of 25 patients were included in the study. Goodman and Baron quantitative acne scar grading system was employed for classification. Patients were treated with dermaroller on right side of face and intradermal PRP injections on left side of face. Response was assessed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months using a visual analog score (VAS). Results: The mean (SD) age of the study participants was 29.8 (5.2) years. Out of 25 patients, 52% (n=13) were males and 48% (n=12) were females. At the end of 4 sessions of microneedling on right cheek, 92% (n=23) had fair response and 8% (n=2) had poor response, whereas on left cheek, 80% (n=20) had good response and 20% (n=5) had excellent response post PRP and this difference was significantly different (p <0.001). Conclusion: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) yields superior outcomes compared to microneedling in improving atrophic acne scars.Top of Form Keywords: Acne scars, Platelet rich plasma, Microneedlinghttps://jmsh.ac.in/articles/dermaroller-versus-platelet-rich-plasma-in-acne-scars-a-prospective-split-face-study
spellingShingle G M Krithika
A S Sanjana
Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study
Journal of Medical Sciences and Health
title Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study
title_full Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study
title_fullStr Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study
title_full_unstemmed Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study
title_short Dermaroller Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acne Scars. A Prospective Split Face Study
title_sort dermaroller versus platelet rich plasma in acne scars a prospective split face study
url https://jmsh.ac.in/articles/dermaroller-versus-platelet-rich-plasma-in-acne-scars-a-prospective-split-face-study
work_keys_str_mv AT gmkrithika dermarollerversusplateletrichplasmainacnescarsaprospectivesplitfacestudy
AT assanjana dermarollerversusplateletrichplasmainacnescarsaprospectivesplitfacestudy