Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties

Transmission network expansion planning (TNEP) is a classic issue in power system studies that has been studied many times. Aim of TNEP is providing enough capacity to transfer power from generation section to load centers in a reliable and economically efficient manner. The mission of this problem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shahriar Abbasi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2024-04-01
Series:مجله مدل سازی در مهندسی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://modelling.semnan.ac.ir/article_8373_c410607e5cbab14acd9f89e8a977cede.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850030989627097088
author Shahriar Abbasi
author_facet Shahriar Abbasi
author_sort Shahriar Abbasi
collection DOAJ
description Transmission network expansion planning (TNEP) is a classic issue in power system studies that has been studied many times. Aim of TNEP is providing enough capacity to transfer power from generation section to load centers in a reliable and economically efficient manner. The mission of this problem is identifying where, when and what type of new transmission lines should be installed in transmission network.Purpose of this article is comparing the IGDT, TOAT and STC methods in robust TNEP (RTNEP) in the presence of load and wind power generation uncertainties. Using these methods, robust expansion plans for the modified 6-bus Garver test system are determined and compared. The simulations results confirm validity of these methods in RTNEP. Therefore, these methods can be easily implemented on any large and real scale power system. Moreover, different types of uncertainties can be easily considered in this planning. Simulation results show, the IGDT method has more computational burden, which considering that the RTNEP problem is a long-term problem, the CPU running time and computational burden are not important. Therefore, the IGDT method is preferable to the TOAT and STC methods due to the ability to find the optimal expansion plans with less investment cost..
format Article
id doaj-art-9f0a104fbc144469a11c3ce582c1cf52
institution DOAJ
issn 2008-4854
2783-2538
language fas
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مجله مدل سازی در مهندسی
spelling doaj-art-9f0a104fbc144469a11c3ce582c1cf522025-08-20T02:59:04ZfasSemnan Universityمجله مدل سازی در مهندسی2008-48542783-25382024-04-01227624125510.22075/jme.2023.31185.24898373Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of UncertaintiesShahriar Abbasi0Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Boys 1, Kermanshah Branch, Technical and Vocational Universtiy (TVU), Kermanshah, IranTransmission network expansion planning (TNEP) is a classic issue in power system studies that has been studied many times. Aim of TNEP is providing enough capacity to transfer power from generation section to load centers in a reliable and economically efficient manner. The mission of this problem is identifying where, when and what type of new transmission lines should be installed in transmission network.Purpose of this article is comparing the IGDT, TOAT and STC methods in robust TNEP (RTNEP) in the presence of load and wind power generation uncertainties. Using these methods, robust expansion plans for the modified 6-bus Garver test system are determined and compared. The simulations results confirm validity of these methods in RTNEP. Therefore, these methods can be easily implemented on any large and real scale power system. Moreover, different types of uncertainties can be easily considered in this planning. Simulation results show, the IGDT method has more computational burden, which considering that the RTNEP problem is a long-term problem, the CPU running time and computational burden are not important. Therefore, the IGDT method is preferable to the TOAT and STC methods due to the ability to find the optimal expansion plans with less investment cost..https://modelling.semnan.ac.ir/article_8373_c410607e5cbab14acd9f89e8a977cede.pdfrobust transmission network expansion planning (rtnep)load uncertaintywind power generation uncertaintyigdttoatstc
spellingShingle Shahriar Abbasi
Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties
مجله مدل سازی در مهندسی
robust transmission network expansion planning (rtnep)
load uncertainty
wind power generation uncertainty
igdt
toat
stc
title Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties
title_full Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties
title_fullStr Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties
title_short Comparison of IGDT, TOAT and STC Methods in Robust Planning of Transmission Network Expansion in the Presence of Uncertainties
title_sort comparison of igdt toat and stc methods in robust planning of transmission network expansion in the presence of uncertainties
topic robust transmission network expansion planning (rtnep)
load uncertainty
wind power generation uncertainty
igdt
toat
stc
url https://modelling.semnan.ac.ir/article_8373_c410607e5cbab14acd9f89e8a977cede.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shahriarabbasi comparisonofigdttoatandstcmethodsinrobustplanningoftransmissionnetworkexpansioninthepresenceofuncertainties