Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity
Graffiti’s dual existence as both public art and illicit practice has generated sustained legal, cultural, and aesthetic debates. This article examines the role of anonymity in shaping how graffiti is recognized, regulated, and interpreted within both legal frameworks and artworld aesthetics. Focusi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Humanities |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/14/5/110 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849711566872641536 |
|---|---|
| author | Adrian Guo Silver |
| author_facet | Adrian Guo Silver |
| author_sort | Adrian Guo Silver |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Graffiti’s dual existence as both public art and illicit practice has generated sustained legal, cultural, and aesthetic debates. This article examines the role of anonymity in shaping how graffiti is recognized, regulated, and interpreted within both legal frameworks and artworld aesthetics. Focusing on the legal battle over 5Pointz, a prominent New York graffiti site that was whitewashed in 2013 and demolished in 2014, I analyze how the Cohen v. G&M Realty L.P. case reveals a structural tension between graffiti’s collective ethos and the legal system’s emphasis on identifiable authorship. Drawing upon legal studies, urban cultural theory, and aesthetics, this article explores how the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) mediated the legal recognition of graffiti, often privileging curated, institutionally sanctioned works while rendering anonymous street art legally vulnerable. I further synthesize scholarly perspectives on 5Pointz to highlight how legal discourse constructs and delimits the status of graffiti within public spaces. Ultimately, I argue that anonymity functions not simply as an absence of authorship but as an aesthetic and political mode of experiencing the object, one that challenges traditional frameworks of artistic attribution and cultural legitimacy. By interrogating the legal and ideological forces that shape graffiti’s recognition, this article situates anonymity as a central, yet often overlooked, feature of graffiti’s critical and aesthetic power. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9ef47a08121a48eab6e67aeafd55e91c |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2076-0787 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Humanities |
| spelling | doaj-art-9ef47a08121a48eab6e67aeafd55e91c2025-08-20T03:14:35ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872025-05-0114511010.3390/h14050110Graffiti and the Aura of AnonymityAdrian Guo Silver0Department of Theatre and Performance, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USAGraffiti’s dual existence as both public art and illicit practice has generated sustained legal, cultural, and aesthetic debates. This article examines the role of anonymity in shaping how graffiti is recognized, regulated, and interpreted within both legal frameworks and artworld aesthetics. Focusing on the legal battle over 5Pointz, a prominent New York graffiti site that was whitewashed in 2013 and demolished in 2014, I analyze how the Cohen v. G&M Realty L.P. case reveals a structural tension between graffiti’s collective ethos and the legal system’s emphasis on identifiable authorship. Drawing upon legal studies, urban cultural theory, and aesthetics, this article explores how the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) mediated the legal recognition of graffiti, often privileging curated, institutionally sanctioned works while rendering anonymous street art legally vulnerable. I further synthesize scholarly perspectives on 5Pointz to highlight how legal discourse constructs and delimits the status of graffiti within public spaces. Ultimately, I argue that anonymity functions not simply as an absence of authorship but as an aesthetic and political mode of experiencing the object, one that challenges traditional frameworks of artistic attribution and cultural legitimacy. By interrogating the legal and ideological forces that shape graffiti’s recognition, this article situates anonymity as a central, yet often overlooked, feature of graffiti’s critical and aesthetic power.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/14/5/110graffitianonymity5Pointzlaw |
| spellingShingle | Adrian Guo Silver Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity Humanities graffiti anonymity 5Pointz law |
| title | Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity |
| title_full | Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity |
| title_fullStr | Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity |
| title_short | Graffiti and the Aura of Anonymity |
| title_sort | graffiti and the aura of anonymity |
| topic | graffiti anonymity 5Pointz law |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/14/5/110 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adrianguosilver graffitiandtheauraofanonymity |