The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach
Abstract The Polar Cap (PC) indices are derived from the magnetic variations generated by the transpolar convection of magnetospheric plasma and embedded magnetic fields driven by the interaction with the solar wind. The PC indices are potentially very useful for space weather monitoring and forecas...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Space Weather |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002442 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850117845387575296 |
|---|---|
| author | Peter Stauning |
| author_facet | Peter Stauning |
| author_sort | Peter Stauning |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The Polar Cap (PC) indices are derived from the magnetic variations generated by the transpolar convection of magnetospheric plasma and embedded magnetic fields driven by the interaction with the solar wind. The PC indices are potentially very useful for space weather monitoring and forecasts and for related research. However, this study suggests that the PC index series in the near‐real‐time and final versions endorsed by the International Association for Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) are invalid and unreliable. Both versions include solar wind sector (SWS) effects in the calculation of the reference levels from which magnetic disturbances are measured. The SWS effects are caused by current systems in the dayside Cusp region related to the Y‐component, BY, of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). However, the IAGA‐endorsed handling of SWS effects may generate unfounded PC index changes of up to 4 mV/m at the nightside away from the Cusp. For the real‐time PCN and PCS indices, the cubic spline‐based reference level construction may cause additional unjustified index excursions of more than 3 mV/m with respect to the corresponding final index values. Noting that PC index values above 2 mV/m indicate geomagnetic storm conditions, such unjustified contributions invalidate the PC index series and prove the IAGA‐endorsed derivation methods erroneous. Alternative derivation methods are shown to provide more consistent index reference levels for both final and real‐time PC indices, to reduce their unfounded excursions, and to significantly increase their reliability. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9e5ab11db2ff4625b94cc3f2fc2cc707 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1542-7390 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Space Weather |
| spelling | doaj-art-9e5ab11db2ff4625b94cc3f2fc2cc7072025-08-20T02:36:00ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902020-10-011810n/an/a10.1029/2020SW002442The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different ApproachPeter Stauning0Research Division Danish Meteorological Institute Copenhagen DenmarkAbstract The Polar Cap (PC) indices are derived from the magnetic variations generated by the transpolar convection of magnetospheric plasma and embedded magnetic fields driven by the interaction with the solar wind. The PC indices are potentially very useful for space weather monitoring and forecasts and for related research. However, this study suggests that the PC index series in the near‐real‐time and final versions endorsed by the International Association for Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) are invalid and unreliable. Both versions include solar wind sector (SWS) effects in the calculation of the reference levels from which magnetic disturbances are measured. The SWS effects are caused by current systems in the dayside Cusp region related to the Y‐component, BY, of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). However, the IAGA‐endorsed handling of SWS effects may generate unfounded PC index changes of up to 4 mV/m at the nightside away from the Cusp. For the real‐time PCN and PCS indices, the cubic spline‐based reference level construction may cause additional unjustified index excursions of more than 3 mV/m with respect to the corresponding final index values. Noting that PC index values above 2 mV/m indicate geomagnetic storm conditions, such unjustified contributions invalidate the PC index series and prove the IAGA‐endorsed derivation methods erroneous. Alternative derivation methods are shown to provide more consistent index reference levels for both final and real‐time PC indices, to reduce their unfounded excursions, and to significantly increase their reliability.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002442Polar Cap indexinvalid IAGA PC index seriesnew derivation methodsreal‐time indicesspace weather |
| spellingShingle | Peter Stauning The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach Space Weather Polar Cap index invalid IAGA PC index series new derivation methods real‐time indices space weather |
| title | The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach |
| title_full | The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach |
| title_fullStr | The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach |
| title_short | The Polar Cap (PC) Index: Invalid Index Series and a Different Approach |
| title_sort | polar cap pc index invalid index series and a different approach |
| topic | Polar Cap index invalid IAGA PC index series new derivation methods real‐time indices space weather |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002442 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peterstauning thepolarcappcindexinvalidindexseriesandadifferentapproach AT peterstauning polarcappcindexinvalidindexseriesandadifferentapproach |