Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity

Abstract We derive and test a CT-based biological age model for predicting longevity, using an automated pipeline of explainable AI algorithms that quantifies skeletal muscle, abdominal fat, aortic calcification, bone density, and solid abdominal organs. We apply these AI tools to abdominal CT scans...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Perry J. Pickhardt, Michael W. Kattan, Matthew H. Lee, B. Dustin Pooler, Ayis Pyrros, Daniel Liu, Ryan Zea, Ronald M. Summers, John W. Garrett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-02-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56741-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823861824270893056
author Perry J. Pickhardt
Michael W. Kattan
Matthew H. Lee
B. Dustin Pooler
Ayis Pyrros
Daniel Liu
Ryan Zea
Ronald M. Summers
John W. Garrett
author_facet Perry J. Pickhardt
Michael W. Kattan
Matthew H. Lee
B. Dustin Pooler
Ayis Pyrros
Daniel Liu
Ryan Zea
Ronald M. Summers
John W. Garrett
author_sort Perry J. Pickhardt
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We derive and test a CT-based biological age model for predicting longevity, using an automated pipeline of explainable AI algorithms that quantifies skeletal muscle, abdominal fat, aortic calcification, bone density, and solid abdominal organs. We apply these AI tools to abdominal CT scans from 123,281 adults (mean age, 53.6 years; 47% women; median follow-up, 5.3 years). The final weighted CT biomarker selection was based on the index of prediction accuracy. The CT model significantly outperforms standard demographic data for predicting longevity (IPA = 29.2 vs. 21.7; 10-year AUC = 0.880 vs. 0.779; p < 0.001). Age- and sex-corrected survival hazard ratio for the highest-vs-lowest risk quartile was 8.73 (95% CI,8.14-9.36) for the CT biological age model, and increased to 24.79 after excluding cancer diagnoses within 5 years of CT. Muscle density, aortic plaque burden, visceral fat density, and bone density contributed the most. Here we show a personalized phenotypic CT biological age model that can be opportunistically-derived, regardless of clinical indication, to better inform risk assessment.
format Article
id doaj-art-9dd571ed0f4d4883ae34c91af2408c14
institution Kabale University
issn 2041-1723
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj-art-9dd571ed0f4d4883ae34c91af2408c142025-02-09T12:45:58ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232025-02-0116111110.1038/s41467-025-56741-wBiological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevityPerry J. Pickhardt0Michael W. Kattan1Matthew H. Lee2B. Dustin Pooler3Ayis Pyrros4Daniel Liu5Ryan Zea6Ronald M. Summers7John W. Garrett8The Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthThe Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland ClinicThe Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthThe Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthDepartment of Radiology, Duly Health and CareThe Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthThe Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthImaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterThe Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public HealthAbstract We derive and test a CT-based biological age model for predicting longevity, using an automated pipeline of explainable AI algorithms that quantifies skeletal muscle, abdominal fat, aortic calcification, bone density, and solid abdominal organs. We apply these AI tools to abdominal CT scans from 123,281 adults (mean age, 53.6 years; 47% women; median follow-up, 5.3 years). The final weighted CT biomarker selection was based on the index of prediction accuracy. The CT model significantly outperforms standard demographic data for predicting longevity (IPA = 29.2 vs. 21.7; 10-year AUC = 0.880 vs. 0.779; p < 0.001). Age- and sex-corrected survival hazard ratio for the highest-vs-lowest risk quartile was 8.73 (95% CI,8.14-9.36) for the CT biological age model, and increased to 24.79 after excluding cancer diagnoses within 5 years of CT. Muscle density, aortic plaque burden, visceral fat density, and bone density contributed the most. Here we show a personalized phenotypic CT biological age model that can be opportunistically-derived, regardless of clinical indication, to better inform risk assessment.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56741-w
spellingShingle Perry J. Pickhardt
Michael W. Kattan
Matthew H. Lee
B. Dustin Pooler
Ayis Pyrros
Daniel Liu
Ryan Zea
Ronald M. Summers
John W. Garrett
Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
Nature Communications
title Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
title_full Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
title_fullStr Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
title_full_unstemmed Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
title_short Biological age model using explainable automated CT-based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
title_sort biological age model using explainable automated ct based cardiometabolic biomarkers for phenotypic prediction of longevity
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56741-w
work_keys_str_mv AT perryjpickhardt biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT michaelwkattan biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT matthewhlee biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT bdustinpooler biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT ayispyrros biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT danielliu biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT ryanzea biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT ronaldmsummers biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity
AT johnwgarrett biologicalagemodelusingexplainableautomatedctbasedcardiometabolicbiomarkersforphenotypicpredictionoflongevity