Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya

Abstract Background Addressing antimicrobial resistance in agri-food systems requires both AMR-specific interventions, which target factors directly impacting AMR (e.g., prescription regulations) and AMR-sensitive interventions, which target factors indirectly impacting AMR transmission (e.g. biosec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark A Caudell, Stella Kiambi, Tabitha Kimani, Anica Buckel, Ruth Omani, Junxia Song, Markus Lipp, Emmanuel Kabali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01580-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849334261350400000
author Mark A Caudell
Stella Kiambi
Tabitha Kimani
Anica Buckel
Ruth Omani
Junxia Song
Markus Lipp
Emmanuel Kabali
author_facet Mark A Caudell
Stella Kiambi
Tabitha Kimani
Anica Buckel
Ruth Omani
Junxia Song
Markus Lipp
Emmanuel Kabali
author_sort Mark A Caudell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Addressing antimicrobial resistance in agri-food systems requires both AMR-specific interventions, which target factors directly impacting AMR (e.g., prescription regulations) and AMR-sensitive interventions, which target factors indirectly impacting AMR transmission (e.g. biosecurity). An approach that can incorporate both AMR-sensitive and AMR-specific interventions is the Farmer Field School approach (FFS), where farmers meet on a demonstration farm to engage/experiment with best production practices across a production cycle. Here, we assess the impacts FFS on AMR-specific and AMR-sensitive practices through evaluating graduates of layer poultry FFSs held in Kenya between 2020 and 2021, alongside a random sample of non-FFS farmers. Methods This longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted in Kiambu County, Kenya. The farms of 56 FFS graduates and 24 randomly selected non-FFS farmers were visited monthly across an eight-month period in 2022 (N = 610 visits). Data was collected on production costs, biosecurity practices, indicators of flock health, and interactions with the professional veterinary sector. Multiple regression models clustering at the farm level were used to evaluate the impacts of FFS participation. Results Across the eight-month evaluation period, FFS graduates were 5.32 times more likely (95% CI: 1.80–15.75) than non-FFS participants to seek out animal healthcare professionals, 2.60 times more likely (95% CI: 1.11–6.09) to obtain prescriptions, and spent around 7.95 USD (-15.79 - -0.10) less on antimicrobials. FFS participants were four times more likely (95% CI: 1.89–8.47) than non-participants to keep clean drinkers and feeders and 2.5 times more likely (95% CI: 1.08–5.78) to report regularly wearing PPE. Indicators of flock health and costs invested in biosecurity products were not significantly different between FFS participants and non-participants. Conclusions Given the role of animal health professionals, prudent antimicrobial use and improved biosecurity in addressing AMR, the FFS approach should be considered a promising approach to mitigate AMR in agri-food systems. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-9dc1fa2193cd402597c691bb9d580ef8
institution Kabale University
issn 2047-2994
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
spelling doaj-art-9dc1fa2193cd402597c691bb9d580ef82025-08-20T03:45:36ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942025-07-0114111410.1186/s13756-025-01580-zFarmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in KenyaMark A Caudell0Stella Kiambi1Tabitha Kimani2Anica Buckel3Ruth Omani4Junxia Song5Markus Lipp6Emmanuel Kabali7Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations ComplexFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations ComplexFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations ComplexFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsAbstract Background Addressing antimicrobial resistance in agri-food systems requires both AMR-specific interventions, which target factors directly impacting AMR (e.g., prescription regulations) and AMR-sensitive interventions, which target factors indirectly impacting AMR transmission (e.g. biosecurity). An approach that can incorporate both AMR-sensitive and AMR-specific interventions is the Farmer Field School approach (FFS), where farmers meet on a demonstration farm to engage/experiment with best production practices across a production cycle. Here, we assess the impacts FFS on AMR-specific and AMR-sensitive practices through evaluating graduates of layer poultry FFSs held in Kenya between 2020 and 2021, alongside a random sample of non-FFS farmers. Methods This longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted in Kiambu County, Kenya. The farms of 56 FFS graduates and 24 randomly selected non-FFS farmers were visited monthly across an eight-month period in 2022 (N = 610 visits). Data was collected on production costs, biosecurity practices, indicators of flock health, and interactions with the professional veterinary sector. Multiple regression models clustering at the farm level were used to evaluate the impacts of FFS participation. Results Across the eight-month evaluation period, FFS graduates were 5.32 times more likely (95% CI: 1.80–15.75) than non-FFS participants to seek out animal healthcare professionals, 2.60 times more likely (95% CI: 1.11–6.09) to obtain prescriptions, and spent around 7.95 USD (-15.79 - -0.10) less on antimicrobials. FFS participants were four times more likely (95% CI: 1.89–8.47) than non-participants to keep clean drinkers and feeders and 2.5 times more likely (95% CI: 1.08–5.78) to report regularly wearing PPE. Indicators of flock health and costs invested in biosecurity products were not significantly different between FFS participants and non-participants. Conclusions Given the role of animal health professionals, prudent antimicrobial use and improved biosecurity in addressing AMR, the FFS approach should be considered a promising approach to mitigate AMR in agri-food systems. Clinical trial number Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01580-zAntimicrobial resistanceFarmer field schoolsAntimicrobial useBiosecurityPoultryKenya
spellingShingle Mark A Caudell
Stella Kiambi
Tabitha Kimani
Anica Buckel
Ruth Omani
Junxia Song
Markus Lipp
Emmanuel Kabali
Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial resistance
Farmer field schools
Antimicrobial use
Biosecurity
Poultry
Kenya
title Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya
title_full Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya
title_fullStr Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya
title_short Farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems: a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non-graduates in Kenya
title_sort farmer field schools as interventions to reduce the need for antimicrobials in agrifood systems a longitudinal analysis of layer farmer field school graduates and non graduates in kenya
topic Antimicrobial resistance
Farmer field schools
Antimicrobial use
Biosecurity
Poultry
Kenya
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01580-z
work_keys_str_mv AT markacaudell farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT stellakiambi farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT tabithakimani farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT anicabuckel farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT ruthomani farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT junxiasong farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT markuslipp farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya
AT emmanuelkabali farmerfieldschoolsasinterventionstoreducetheneedforantimicrobialsinagrifoodsystemsalongitudinalanalysisoflayerfarmerfieldschoolgraduatesandnongraduatesinkenya