Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States
What are human rights? Although legal scholars point to a growing list of international entitlements, social scientists have highlighted underlying ideological assumptions and the selective interpretation of human rights in practice. Lay conceptualizations of human rights, however, merit further exa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Socius |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251333455 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849724164451074048 |
|---|---|
| author | Katherine Jensen Monika Krause Benjamin Witkovsky |
| author_facet | Katherine Jensen Monika Krause Benjamin Witkovsky |
| author_sort | Katherine Jensen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | What are human rights? Although legal scholars point to a growing list of international entitlements, social scientists have highlighted underlying ideological assumptions and the selective interpretation of human rights in practice. Lay conceptualizations of human rights, however, merit further examination. This study brings together human rights research and cognitive sociology, deploying a novel, online task-based study to explore the content and structure of human rights as a lay category of thought. To do so, the authors examine rights exemplars, perceived violations, goodness of fit, and response times in a sample of adults in the United States. The findings suggest that freedom of speech is a cognitive prototype. Civil and political rights were prominent in respondents’ minds relative to economic, social, and cultural rights. There were substantive exceptions in both directions; certain political rights, such as asylum, were peripheral or dismissed from the human rights concept, while health care, food, and education were salient. Results indicate that respondents were disposed to include content within the human rights category when asked. This study garners insights on how ordinary people perceive and understand human rights in the United States, breaking ground for further comparative research. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9dbbe922ee434968a860422a053bf048 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2378-0231 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Socius |
| spelling | doaj-art-9dbbe922ee434968a860422a053bf0482025-08-20T03:10:49ZengSAGE PublishingSocius2378-02312025-04-011110.1177/23780231251333455Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United StatesKatherine Jensen0Monika Krause1Benjamin Witkovsky2University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAThe London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UKUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAWhat are human rights? Although legal scholars point to a growing list of international entitlements, social scientists have highlighted underlying ideological assumptions and the selective interpretation of human rights in practice. Lay conceptualizations of human rights, however, merit further examination. This study brings together human rights research and cognitive sociology, deploying a novel, online task-based study to explore the content and structure of human rights as a lay category of thought. To do so, the authors examine rights exemplars, perceived violations, goodness of fit, and response times in a sample of adults in the United States. The findings suggest that freedom of speech is a cognitive prototype. Civil and political rights were prominent in respondents’ minds relative to economic, social, and cultural rights. There were substantive exceptions in both directions; certain political rights, such as asylum, were peripheral or dismissed from the human rights concept, while health care, food, and education were salient. Results indicate that respondents were disposed to include content within the human rights category when asked. This study garners insights on how ordinary people perceive and understand human rights in the United States, breaking ground for further comparative research.https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251333455 |
| spellingShingle | Katherine Jensen Monika Krause Benjamin Witkovsky Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States Socius |
| title | Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States |
| title_full | Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States |
| title_fullStr | Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States |
| title_full_unstemmed | Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States |
| title_short | Human Rights as a Lay Category of Thought: Content and Structure in the United States |
| title_sort | human rights as a lay category of thought content and structure in the united states |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251333455 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT katherinejensen humanrightsasalaycategoryofthoughtcontentandstructureintheunitedstates AT monikakrause humanrightsasalaycategoryofthoughtcontentandstructureintheunitedstates AT benjaminwitkovsky humanrightsasalaycategoryofthoughtcontentandstructureintheunitedstates |