Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.

Health facility assessments provide important data to measure the quality of health services delivered to populations. These assessments are comprehensive, resource intensive, and periodic to inform medium- to-longer-term policies. However, in absence of other reliable data sources, country decision...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Neill, Pablo Amor Fernandez, Ruchika Bhatia, Jigyasa Sharma, Kathryn Andrews, Sven Neelsen, Etoile Pinder, Marifat Abdullaev, Firuza Safarova, Mutriba Latypova, Mirja Channa Sjoblom, Tashrik Ahmed, Michael A Peters, Ashley Sheffel, Tawab Hashemi, Peter M Hansen, Ghafur Muhsinzoda, Gil Shapira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309570
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849469954498232320
author Rachel Neill
Pablo Amor Fernandez
Ruchika Bhatia
Jigyasa Sharma
Kathryn Andrews
Sven Neelsen
Etoile Pinder
Marifat Abdullaev
Firuza Safarova
Mutriba Latypova
Mirja Channa Sjoblom
Tashrik Ahmed
Michael A Peters
Ashley Sheffel
Tawab Hashemi
Peter M Hansen
Ghafur Muhsinzoda
Gil Shapira
author_facet Rachel Neill
Pablo Amor Fernandez
Ruchika Bhatia
Jigyasa Sharma
Kathryn Andrews
Sven Neelsen
Etoile Pinder
Marifat Abdullaev
Firuza Safarova
Mutriba Latypova
Mirja Channa Sjoblom
Tashrik Ahmed
Michael A Peters
Ashley Sheffel
Tawab Hashemi
Peter M Hansen
Ghafur Muhsinzoda
Gil Shapira
author_sort Rachel Neill
collection DOAJ
description Health facility assessments provide important data to measure the quality of health services delivered to populations. These assessments are comprehensive, resource intensive, and periodic to inform medium- to-longer-term policies. However, in absence of other reliable data sources, country decision makers often rely on outdated data to address service delivery challenges that change more frequently. High-frequency phone surveys are a potential option to improve the efficiency and timeliness of collecting time-sensitive service delivery indicators in-between comprehensive in-person assessments. The objectives of this study are to assess the reliability, concurrent criterion validity, and non-response rates in a rapid phone-based health facility assessment developed by the Global Financing Facility's FASTR initiative compared to a comprehensive in-person health facility assessment developed by the World Bank's Service Delivery Indicators Health Program. The in-person survey and corresponding in-person item verification will serve as the gold standard. Both surveys will be administered to an identical sample of 500 health facilities in Tajikistan using the same data collection entity. To assess reliability, percent agreement, Cohens Kappa, and prevalence and bias adjusted Kappa will be calculated. To assess concurrent criterion validity, sensitivity and specificity will be calculated, with a cut-off of.7 used for adequate validity. The study will further compare response rates and dropout rates of both surveys using simple t-tests and balance tests to identify if the characteristics of the phone-based and in-person survey samples are similar after accounting for any differences in survey response rates. The results of this study will provide important insights into the reliability and validity of phone-based data collection approaches for health facility assessments. This is critical as Ministries of Health seek to establish and sustain more continuous data collection, analysis, and use of health facility-level data to complement periodic in-person assessments to improve the quality of services provided to their populations.
format Article
id doaj-art-9db80e5d15c14603a40c2d84dc5a84a8
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-9db80e5d15c14603a40c2d84dc5a84a82025-08-20T03:25:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01205e030957010.1371/journal.pone.0309570Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.Rachel NeillPablo Amor FernandezRuchika BhatiaJigyasa SharmaKathryn AndrewsSven NeelsenEtoile PinderMarifat AbdullaevFiruza SafarovaMutriba LatypovaMirja Channa SjoblomTashrik AhmedMichael A PetersAshley SheffelTawab HashemiPeter M HansenGhafur MuhsinzodaGil ShapiraHealth facility assessments provide important data to measure the quality of health services delivered to populations. These assessments are comprehensive, resource intensive, and periodic to inform medium- to-longer-term policies. However, in absence of other reliable data sources, country decision makers often rely on outdated data to address service delivery challenges that change more frequently. High-frequency phone surveys are a potential option to improve the efficiency and timeliness of collecting time-sensitive service delivery indicators in-between comprehensive in-person assessments. The objectives of this study are to assess the reliability, concurrent criterion validity, and non-response rates in a rapid phone-based health facility assessment developed by the Global Financing Facility's FASTR initiative compared to a comprehensive in-person health facility assessment developed by the World Bank's Service Delivery Indicators Health Program. The in-person survey and corresponding in-person item verification will serve as the gold standard. Both surveys will be administered to an identical sample of 500 health facilities in Tajikistan using the same data collection entity. To assess reliability, percent agreement, Cohens Kappa, and prevalence and bias adjusted Kappa will be calculated. To assess concurrent criterion validity, sensitivity and specificity will be calculated, with a cut-off of.7 used for adequate validity. The study will further compare response rates and dropout rates of both surveys using simple t-tests and balance tests to identify if the characteristics of the phone-based and in-person survey samples are similar after accounting for any differences in survey response rates. The results of this study will provide important insights into the reliability and validity of phone-based data collection approaches for health facility assessments. This is critical as Ministries of Health seek to establish and sustain more continuous data collection, analysis, and use of health facility-level data to complement periodic in-person assessments to improve the quality of services provided to their populations.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309570
spellingShingle Rachel Neill
Pablo Amor Fernandez
Ruchika Bhatia
Jigyasa Sharma
Kathryn Andrews
Sven Neelsen
Etoile Pinder
Marifat Abdullaev
Firuza Safarova
Mutriba Latypova
Mirja Channa Sjoblom
Tashrik Ahmed
Michael A Peters
Ashley Sheffel
Tawab Hashemi
Peter M Hansen
Ghafur Muhsinzoda
Gil Shapira
Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.
title_full Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.
title_fullStr Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.
title_short Comparison of the results of in-person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in Tajikistan: A validation study protocol.
title_sort comparison of the results of in person and mobile phone surveys for a health facility assessment in tajikistan a validation study protocol
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309570
work_keys_str_mv AT rachelneill comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT pabloamorfernandez comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT ruchikabhatia comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT jigyasasharma comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT kathrynandrews comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT svenneelsen comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT etoilepinder comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT marifatabdullaev comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT firuzasafarova comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT mutribalatypova comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT mirjachannasjoblom comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT tashrikahmed comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT michaelapeters comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT ashleysheffel comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT tawabhashemi comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT petermhansen comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT ghafurmuhsinzoda comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol
AT gilshapira comparisonoftheresultsofinpersonandmobilephonesurveysforahealthfacilityassessmentintajikistanavalidationstudyprotocol