Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.

Human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) isolated from fetal tissues hold promise for use in tissue engineering applications and cell-based therapies, but their collection is restricted ethically and technically. In contrast, the placenta is a potential source of readily-obtainable stem cells thro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gemma N Jones, Dafni Moschidou, Tamara-Isabel Puga-Iglesias, Katarzyna Kuleszewicz, Maximilien Vanleene, Sandra J Shefelbine, George Bou-Gharios, Nicholas M Fisk, Anna L David, Paolo De Coppi, Pascale V Guillot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043395&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687270804684800
author Gemma N Jones
Dafni Moschidou
Tamara-Isabel Puga-Iglesias
Katarzyna Kuleszewicz
Maximilien Vanleene
Sandra J Shefelbine
George Bou-Gharios
Nicholas M Fisk
Anna L David
Paolo De Coppi
Pascale V Guillot
author_facet Gemma N Jones
Dafni Moschidou
Tamara-Isabel Puga-Iglesias
Katarzyna Kuleszewicz
Maximilien Vanleene
Sandra J Shefelbine
George Bou-Gharios
Nicholas M Fisk
Anna L David
Paolo De Coppi
Pascale V Guillot
author_sort Gemma N Jones
collection DOAJ
description Human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) isolated from fetal tissues hold promise for use in tissue engineering applications and cell-based therapies, but their collection is restricted ethically and technically. In contrast, the placenta is a potential source of readily-obtainable stem cells throughout pregnancy. In fetal tissues, early gestational stem cells are known to have advantageous characteristics over neonatal and adult stem cells. Accordingly, we investigated whether early fetal placental chorionic stem cells (e-CSC) were physiologically superior to their late gestation fetal chorionic counterparts (l-CSC). We showed that e-CSC shared a common phenotype with l-CSC, differentiating down the osteogenic, adipogenic and neurogenic pathways, and containing a subset of cells endogenously expressing NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC, and KLF4, as well as an array of genes expressed in pluripotent stem cells and primordial germ cells, including CD24, NANOG, SSEA4, SSEA3, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, STELLA, FRAGILIS, NANOS3, DAZL and SSEA1. However, we showed that e-CSC have characteristics of an earlier state of stemness compared to l-CSC, such as smaller size, faster kinetics, uniquely expressing OCT4A variant 1 and showing higher levels of expression of NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC and KLF4 than l-CSC. Furthermore e-CSC, but not l-CSC, formed embryoid bodies containing cells from the three germ layer lineages. Finally, we showed that e-CSC demonstrate higher tissue repair in vivo; when transplanted in the osteogenesis imperfecta mice, e-CSC, but not l-CSC increased bone quality and plasticity; and when applied to a skin wound, e-CSC, but not l-CSC, accelerated healing compared to controls. Our results provide insight into the ontogeny of the stemness phenotype during fetal development and suggest that the more primitive characteristics of early compared to late gestation fetal chorionic stem cells may be translationally advantageous.
format Article
id doaj-art-9daf098975aa48ffa18a8f9bc460f3f2
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-9daf098975aa48ffa18a8f9bc460f3f22025-08-20T03:22:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0179e4339510.1371/journal.pone.0043395Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.Gemma N JonesDafni MoschidouTamara-Isabel Puga-IglesiasKatarzyna KuleszewiczMaximilien VanleeneSandra J ShefelbineGeorge Bou-GhariosNicholas M FiskAnna L DavidPaolo De CoppiPascale V GuillotHuman mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) isolated from fetal tissues hold promise for use in tissue engineering applications and cell-based therapies, but their collection is restricted ethically and technically. In contrast, the placenta is a potential source of readily-obtainable stem cells throughout pregnancy. In fetal tissues, early gestational stem cells are known to have advantageous characteristics over neonatal and adult stem cells. Accordingly, we investigated whether early fetal placental chorionic stem cells (e-CSC) were physiologically superior to their late gestation fetal chorionic counterparts (l-CSC). We showed that e-CSC shared a common phenotype with l-CSC, differentiating down the osteogenic, adipogenic and neurogenic pathways, and containing a subset of cells endogenously expressing NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC, and KLF4, as well as an array of genes expressed in pluripotent stem cells and primordial germ cells, including CD24, NANOG, SSEA4, SSEA3, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, STELLA, FRAGILIS, NANOS3, DAZL and SSEA1. However, we showed that e-CSC have characteristics of an earlier state of stemness compared to l-CSC, such as smaller size, faster kinetics, uniquely expressing OCT4A variant 1 and showing higher levels of expression of NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC and KLF4 than l-CSC. Furthermore e-CSC, but not l-CSC, formed embryoid bodies containing cells from the three germ layer lineages. Finally, we showed that e-CSC demonstrate higher tissue repair in vivo; when transplanted in the osteogenesis imperfecta mice, e-CSC, but not l-CSC increased bone quality and plasticity; and when applied to a skin wound, e-CSC, but not l-CSC, accelerated healing compared to controls. Our results provide insight into the ontogeny of the stemness phenotype during fetal development and suggest that the more primitive characteristics of early compared to late gestation fetal chorionic stem cells may be translationally advantageous.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043395&type=printable
spellingShingle Gemma N Jones
Dafni Moschidou
Tamara-Isabel Puga-Iglesias
Katarzyna Kuleszewicz
Maximilien Vanleene
Sandra J Shefelbine
George Bou-Gharios
Nicholas M Fisk
Anna L David
Paolo De Coppi
Pascale V Guillot
Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.
PLoS ONE
title Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.
title_full Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.
title_fullStr Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.
title_full_unstemmed Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.
title_short Ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells.
title_sort ontological differences in first compared to third trimester human fetal placental chorionic stem cells
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043395&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT gemmanjones ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT dafnimoschidou ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT tamaraisabelpugaiglesias ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT katarzynakuleszewicz ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT maximilienvanleene ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT sandrajshefelbine ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT georgebougharios ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT nicholasmfisk ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT annaldavid ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT paolodecoppi ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells
AT pascalevguillot ontologicaldifferencesinfirstcomparedtothirdtrimesterhumanfetalplacentalchorionicstemcells