COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.

This study was conducted to evaluate the histomorphological changes occurred during intestinal anastomosis performed by laparoscopic Vs conventional techniques in eighteen dogs, which were divided randomly into three groups. In group 1, intestinal anastomosis was performed extracorporeally by laparo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahjat Tayfor Abass, and Othman Jalal Ali, Ali Hussain Hasan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Basrah, Iraq 2011-06-01
Series:Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjvr.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_55038_ba2ae7db1c9882b719311e89c5056915.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849321444127801344
author Bahjat Tayfor Abass
and Othman Jalal Ali
Ali Hussain Hasan
author_facet Bahjat Tayfor Abass
and Othman Jalal Ali
Ali Hussain Hasan
author_sort Bahjat Tayfor Abass
collection DOAJ
description This study was conducted to evaluate the histomorphological changes occurred during intestinal anastomosis performed by laparoscopic Vs conventional techniques in eighteen dogs, which were divided randomly into three groups. In group 1, intestinal anastomosis was performed extracorporeally by laparoscopic-assisted surgery, during which a loop of the small intestine was exteriorized through a mini-laparotomy opening and was surgically resected and anastomsed by simple interrupted sutures; in group 2, intestinal anastomosis was carried out by intracorporeal laparoscopic surgery; and in group 3, intestinal anastomosis was performed by conventional laparotomy. Intestinal biopsies were obtained from the site of anastomosis in all dogs at days 15 and 30 following the operation. Normal regeneration of the structural constituents of the intestine was observed 15 days following anastomosis in animals of the first and second groups compared to villous atrophy associated with delayed and partial regeneration of the intestinal mucosa that were manifested in animals of the third group. In addition, histopathological changes indicative of serosal adhesion were observed in two animals of the latter group. These results showed that intestinal anastomosis achieved by laparoscopic surgery revealed better and faster healing rates compared to intestinal anastomosis achieved by conventional laparoptomy
format Article
id doaj-art-9da9b84203fc4f50acbbeb2f450e28f2
institution Kabale University
issn 1813-8497
2410-8456
language English
publishDate 2011-06-01
publisher College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Basrah, Iraq
record_format Article
series Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research
spelling doaj-art-9da9b84203fc4f50acbbeb2f450e28f22025-08-20T03:49:45ZengCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Basrah, IraqBasrah Journal of Veterinary Research1813-84972410-84562011-06-01101566610.33762/bvetr.2011.5503855038COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.Bahjat Tayfor Abassand Othman Jalal AliAli Hussain HasanThis study was conducted to evaluate the histomorphological changes occurred during intestinal anastomosis performed by laparoscopic Vs conventional techniques in eighteen dogs, which were divided randomly into three groups. In group 1, intestinal anastomosis was performed extracorporeally by laparoscopic-assisted surgery, during which a loop of the small intestine was exteriorized through a mini-laparotomy opening and was surgically resected and anastomsed by simple interrupted sutures; in group 2, intestinal anastomosis was carried out by intracorporeal laparoscopic surgery; and in group 3, intestinal anastomosis was performed by conventional laparotomy. Intestinal biopsies were obtained from the site of anastomosis in all dogs at days 15 and 30 following the operation. Normal regeneration of the structural constituents of the intestine was observed 15 days following anastomosis in animals of the first and second groups compared to villous atrophy associated with delayed and partial regeneration of the intestinal mucosa that were manifested in animals of the third group. In addition, histopathological changes indicative of serosal adhesion were observed in two animals of the latter group. These results showed that intestinal anastomosis achieved by laparoscopic surgery revealed better and faster healing rates compared to intestinal anastomosis achieved by conventional laparoptomyhttps://bjvr.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_55038_ba2ae7db1c9882b719311e89c5056915.pdfintestinal anastomosislaparoscopy vs conventionaldog
spellingShingle Bahjat Tayfor Abass
and Othman Jalal Ali
Ali Hussain Hasan
COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.
Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research
intestinal anastomosis
laparoscopy vs conventional
dog
title COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.
title_full COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.
title_short COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS BY LAPAROSCOPIC VS CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN DOGS.
title_sort comparative histomorphological study of intestinal anastomosis by laparoscopic vs conventional methods in dogs
topic intestinal anastomosis
laparoscopy vs conventional
dog
url https://bjvr.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_55038_ba2ae7db1c9882b719311e89c5056915.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bahjattayforabass comparativehistomorphologicalstudyofintestinalanastomosisbylaparoscopicvsconventionalmethodsindogs
AT andothmanjalalali comparativehistomorphologicalstudyofintestinalanastomosisbylaparoscopicvsconventionalmethodsindogs
AT alihussainhasan comparativehistomorphologicalstudyofintestinalanastomosisbylaparoscopicvsconventionalmethodsindogs