The clinical outcomes of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 in resected pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective study
Abstract Background Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard form of care for resected pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Its treatment regimens include monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 and combination therapy with gemcitabine plus capecitabine or modified FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinot...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Cancer |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14617-8 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Background Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard form of care for resected pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Its treatment regimens include monotherapy with gemcitabine or S-1 and combination therapy with gemcitabine plus capecitabine or modified FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin). Whether the efficacy of the adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) combination is realized remains uncertain. Methods This single-institute, retrospective, real-world study included 122 patients with resected PC from the period January 2014 to July 2021. Amongst them, 73 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, with 21 and 35 patients receiving gemcitabine monotherapy and GS combination adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. The clinical characteristics, outcomes and toxicities of chemotherapy were compared between these two groups. Results The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for the patients who had received GS combination were 15.8 months and 31.2 months, respectively. Compared with gemcitabine monotherapy, there was a trend towards favorable DFS (10.7 months in gemcitabine monotherapy, p = 0.083), but no OS benefits (24 months, p = 0.517) with GS combination. However, for patients in an advanced disease condition (Stages II and III), the GS combination offered statistically significant longer DFS (14.9 vs. 8.8 months; p = 0.015) and OS (31.2 vs. 21.6 months; p = 0.036), when compared with gemcitabine monotherapy. The adverse effects were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions In our real-world study, use of the GS combination could be another option for resected PC patients, particularly for those who are in a more advanced (Stage II and III) disease condition. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1471-2407 |