Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives

The risk of developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) during a lifetime, i.e., pain, aching, or stiffness in a joint associated with radiographic KOA, was estimated in 2008 to be around 40% in men and 47% in women. The clinical and scientific communities lack an efficient diagnostic method to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henri Favreau, Kirsley Chennen, Sylvain Feruglio, Elise Perennes, Nicolas Anton, Thierry Vandamme, Nadia Jessel, Olivier Poch, Guillaume Conzatti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Biomedicines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/7/1644
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405773063389184
author Henri Favreau
Kirsley Chennen
Sylvain Feruglio
Elise Perennes
Nicolas Anton
Thierry Vandamme
Nadia Jessel
Olivier Poch
Guillaume Conzatti
author_facet Henri Favreau
Kirsley Chennen
Sylvain Feruglio
Elise Perennes
Nicolas Anton
Thierry Vandamme
Nadia Jessel
Olivier Poch
Guillaume Conzatti
author_sort Henri Favreau
collection DOAJ
description The risk of developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) during a lifetime, i.e., pain, aching, or stiffness in a joint associated with radiographic KOA, was estimated in 2008 to be around 40% in men and 47% in women. The clinical and scientific communities lack an efficient diagnostic method to effectively monitor, evaluate, and predict the evolution of KOA before and during the therapeutic protocol. In this review, we summarize the main methods that are used or seem promising for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, with a specific focus on non- or low-invasive methods. As standard diagnostic tools, arthroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and X-ray radiography provide spatial and direct visualization of the joint. However, discrepancies between findings and patient feelings often occur, indicating a lack of correlation between current imaging methods and clinical symptoms. Alternative strategies are in development, including the analysis of biochemical markers or acoustic emission recordings. These methods have undergone deep development and propose, with non- or minimally invasive procedures, to obtain data on tissue condition. However, they present some drawbacks, such as possible interference or the lack of direct visualization of the tissue. Other original methods show strong potential in the field of KOA monitoring, such as electrical bioimpedance or near-infrared spectrometry. These methods could permit us to obtain cheap, portable, and non-invasive data on joint tissue health, while they still need strong implementation to be validated. Also, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis seems essential to effectively develop and validate predictive models for KOA evolution, provided that a large and robust database is available. This would offer a powerful tool for researchers and clinicians to improve therapeutic strategies while permitting an anticipated adaptation of the clinical protocols, moving toward reliable and personalized medicine.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d8e4097c2bb4a2392aec7adcfc81d78
institution Kabale University
issn 2227-9059
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomedicines
spelling doaj-art-9d8e4097c2bb4a2392aec7adcfc81d782025-08-20T03:36:35ZengMDPI AGBiomedicines2227-90592025-07-01137164410.3390/biomedicines13071644Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and PerspectivesHenri Favreau0Kirsley Chennen1Sylvain Feruglio2Elise Perennes3Nicolas Anton4Thierry Vandamme5Nadia Jessel6Olivier Poch7Guillaume Conzatti8Université de Strasbourg, INSERM, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM) UMR 1260, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceLaboratory of Medical Genetics, INSERM U1112, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceSorbonne Université, Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6), CNRS UMR7606, 4 Place Jussieu, CEDEX 05, 75252 Paris, FranceUniversité de Strasbourg, INSERM, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM) UMR 1260, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceUniversité de Strasbourg, INSERM, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM) UMR 1260, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceUniversité de Strasbourg, INSERM, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM) UMR 1260, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceUniversité de Strasbourg, INSERM, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM) UMR 1260, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceUniversité de Strasbourg, Complex Systems and Translational Bioinformatics (CSTB), ICube Laboratory, CNRS UMR 7357, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceUniversité de Strasbourg, INSERM, Regenerative Nanomedicine (RNM) UMR 1260, CRBS, 1 Rue Eugène Boeckel, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceThe risk of developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) during a lifetime, i.e., pain, aching, or stiffness in a joint associated with radiographic KOA, was estimated in 2008 to be around 40% in men and 47% in women. The clinical and scientific communities lack an efficient diagnostic method to effectively monitor, evaluate, and predict the evolution of KOA before and during the therapeutic protocol. In this review, we summarize the main methods that are used or seem promising for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, with a specific focus on non- or low-invasive methods. As standard diagnostic tools, arthroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and X-ray radiography provide spatial and direct visualization of the joint. However, discrepancies between findings and patient feelings often occur, indicating a lack of correlation between current imaging methods and clinical symptoms. Alternative strategies are in development, including the analysis of biochemical markers or acoustic emission recordings. These methods have undergone deep development and propose, with non- or minimally invasive procedures, to obtain data on tissue condition. However, they present some drawbacks, such as possible interference or the lack of direct visualization of the tissue. Other original methods show strong potential in the field of KOA monitoring, such as electrical bioimpedance or near-infrared spectrometry. These methods could permit us to obtain cheap, portable, and non-invasive data on joint tissue health, while they still need strong implementation to be validated. Also, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis seems essential to effectively develop and validate predictive models for KOA evolution, provided that a large and robust database is available. This would offer a powerful tool for researchers and clinicians to improve therapeutic strategies while permitting an anticipated adaptation of the clinical protocols, moving toward reliable and personalized medicine.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/7/1644diagnosismedical deviceosteoarthritisartificial intelligence
spellingShingle Henri Favreau
Kirsley Chennen
Sylvain Feruglio
Elise Perennes
Nicolas Anton
Thierry Vandamme
Nadia Jessel
Olivier Poch
Guillaume Conzatti
Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives
Biomedicines
diagnosis
medical device
osteoarthritis
artificial intelligence
title Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives
title_full Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives
title_fullStr Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives
title_short Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives
title_sort knee osteoarthritis diagnosis future and perspectives
topic diagnosis
medical device
osteoarthritis
artificial intelligence
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/7/1644
work_keys_str_mv AT henrifavreau kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT kirsleychennen kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT sylvainferuglio kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT eliseperennes kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT nicolasanton kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT thierryvandamme kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT nadiajessel kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT olivierpoch kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives
AT guillaumeconzatti kneeosteoarthritisdiagnosisfutureandperspectives