« Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
Conservation, whether it be of landscape or nature, is necessarily rooted in human culture, because the perception of what is landscape, and what is nature, and why a given landscape or area of nature is important, is a human judgment. This article focuses on the cultural idea of heritage, and its r...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Revue d'ethnoécologie |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1927 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832095906406596608 |
---|---|
author | Kenneth R. Olwig |
author_facet | Kenneth R. Olwig |
author_sort | Kenneth R. Olwig |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Conservation, whether it be of landscape or nature, is necessarily rooted in human culture, because the perception of what is landscape, and what is nature, and why a given landscape or area of nature is important, is a human judgment. This article focuses on the cultural idea of heritage, and its role in determining why certain landscapes, conceptualized as being « natural », are conserved. It argues that « used », as opposed to « virgin », landscapes have a particular appeal because they have been preserved from generation to generation as a form of common inheritance that individuals do not own, but « merely look after it for the next generation ». To illustrate the point it takes its point of departure in a highly successful watch advertisement that uses this phrase as its slogan. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9d7e2edcb7c54242aa7f21029a871527 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2267-2419 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-12-01 |
publisher | Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie |
record_format | Article |
series | Revue d'ethnoécologie |
spelling | doaj-art-9d7e2edcb7c54242aa7f21029a8715272025-02-05T16:24:56ZengLaboratoire Éco-anthropologie et EthnobiologieRevue d'ethnoécologie2267-24192014-12-01610.4000/ethnoecologie.1927« Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National NatureKenneth R. OlwigConservation, whether it be of landscape or nature, is necessarily rooted in human culture, because the perception of what is landscape, and what is nature, and why a given landscape or area of nature is important, is a human judgment. This article focuses on the cultural idea of heritage, and its role in determining why certain landscapes, conceptualized as being « natural », are conserved. It argues that « used », as opposed to « virgin », landscapes have a particular appeal because they have been preserved from generation to generation as a form of common inheritance that individuals do not own, but « merely look after it for the next generation ». To illustrate the point it takes its point of departure in a highly successful watch advertisement that uses this phrase as its slogan.https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1927natureconservationheritagelandscapecommonspastoral |
spellingShingle | Kenneth R. Olwig « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature Revue d'ethnoécologie nature conservation heritage landscape commons pastoral |
title | « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature |
title_full | « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature |
title_fullStr | « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature |
title_full_unstemmed | « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature |
title_short | « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature |
title_sort | used landscape s cultural heritage contra virgin national nature |
topic | nature conservation heritage landscape commons pastoral |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennethrolwig usedlandscapesculturalheritagecontravirginnationalnature |