Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study

ABSTRACT Aims To compare glycaemic outcomes for two automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the Tandem Control IQ (CIQ) and the MiniMed 780G (MM780G). Material and Methods In this observational study, we evaluated 60 days of glycaemic data from 139 persons with type 1 diabetes (CIQ: 79 persons, MM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanne Fisker, Mia Christensen, Ermina Bach, Bo Martin Bibby, Klavs Würgler Hansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70043
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849325979651014656
author Sanne Fisker
Mia Christensen
Ermina Bach
Bo Martin Bibby
Klavs Würgler Hansen
author_facet Sanne Fisker
Mia Christensen
Ermina Bach
Bo Martin Bibby
Klavs Würgler Hansen
author_sort Sanne Fisker
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Aims To compare glycaemic outcomes for two automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the Tandem Control IQ (CIQ) and the MiniMed 780G (MM780G). Material and Methods In this observational study, we evaluated 60 days of glycaemic data from 139 persons with type 1 diabetes (CIQ: 79 persons, MM780G: 60 persons), who had an active glucose sensor time ≥ 85%. Results The time with AID was median 620 (IQR, 439–755) days for CIQ users and 509 (429–744) days for MM780G users (p = 0.26). The last HbA1c before initiation of AID was 59.7 mmol/mol in CIQ and 60.1 mmol/mol in MM780G (p = 0.88). The time with an active glucose sensor was higher for CIQ than MM780G (median 98.5 (97.4–98.0)% vs. 96.5 (94.9–97.0)%, p < 0.001). Time in range (TIR, glucose 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) was lower in CIQ than MM780G (mean 68.9% ± 11.4% vs. 73.7% ± 12.0%, p = 0.02) as was time in tight range (TITR) (glucose 3.9–7.8 mmol/L) (43.0% ± 12.2% vs. 48.4% ± 12.7%, p = 0.01). The difference in TIR (4.2 (95% CI 1.0–7.5)%, p = 0.01) and TITR (5.0 (1.4–8.6)%, p < 0.01) remained statistically significant in a multiple regression model controlling for various baseline variables. Time with an absolute rate of glucose change > 1.5 mmol/L/15 min was higher in CIQ than MM780G (9.4 (IQR, 7.2–13.3)% vs. 7.4 (5.2–10.4)%, p < 0.001). Conclusions The CIQ system had a higher active glucose sensor time but a lower TIR, TITR, and a higher time with a rapid glucose rate of change than the MM780G system.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d78f234840147d4b511bc59fb3cdc6c
institution Kabale University
issn 2398-9238
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
spelling doaj-art-9d78f234840147d4b511bc59fb3cdc6c2025-08-20T03:48:15ZengWileyEndocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism2398-92382025-05-0183n/an/a10.1002/edm2.70043Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational StudySanne Fisker0Mia Christensen1Ermina Bach2Bo Martin Bibby3Klavs Würgler Hansen4Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus DenmarkMedical Diagnostic Center Silkeborg Regional Hospital Silkeborg DenmarkSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus DenmarkSection for Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus DenmarkMedical Diagnostic Center Silkeborg Regional Hospital Silkeborg DenmarkABSTRACT Aims To compare glycaemic outcomes for two automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, the Tandem Control IQ (CIQ) and the MiniMed 780G (MM780G). Material and Methods In this observational study, we evaluated 60 days of glycaemic data from 139 persons with type 1 diabetes (CIQ: 79 persons, MM780G: 60 persons), who had an active glucose sensor time ≥ 85%. Results The time with AID was median 620 (IQR, 439–755) days for CIQ users and 509 (429–744) days for MM780G users (p = 0.26). The last HbA1c before initiation of AID was 59.7 mmol/mol in CIQ and 60.1 mmol/mol in MM780G (p = 0.88). The time with an active glucose sensor was higher for CIQ than MM780G (median 98.5 (97.4–98.0)% vs. 96.5 (94.9–97.0)%, p < 0.001). Time in range (TIR, glucose 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) was lower in CIQ than MM780G (mean 68.9% ± 11.4% vs. 73.7% ± 12.0%, p = 0.02) as was time in tight range (TITR) (glucose 3.9–7.8 mmol/L) (43.0% ± 12.2% vs. 48.4% ± 12.7%, p = 0.01). The difference in TIR (4.2 (95% CI 1.0–7.5)%, p = 0.01) and TITR (5.0 (1.4–8.6)%, p < 0.01) remained statistically significant in a multiple regression model controlling for various baseline variables. Time with an absolute rate of glucose change > 1.5 mmol/L/15 min was higher in CIQ than MM780G (9.4 (IQR, 7.2–13.3)% vs. 7.4 (5.2–10.4)%, p < 0.001). Conclusions The CIQ system had a higher active glucose sensor time but a lower TIR, TITR, and a higher time with a rapid glucose rate of change than the MM780G system.https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70043automated insulin deliverycontinuous glucose monitoringglucose rate of changeglucose time in rangetype 1 diabetes
spellingShingle Sanne Fisker
Mia Christensen
Ermina Bach
Bo Martin Bibby
Klavs Würgler Hansen
Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
automated insulin delivery
continuous glucose monitoring
glucose rate of change
glucose time in range
type 1 diabetes
title Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_full Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_short Long‐Term Performance of Two Systems for Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational Study
title_sort long term performance of two systems for automated insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes an observational study
topic automated insulin delivery
continuous glucose monitoring
glucose rate of change
glucose time in range
type 1 diabetes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70043
work_keys_str_mv AT sannefisker longtermperformanceoftwosystemsforautomatedinsulindeliveryinadultswithtype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT miachristensen longtermperformanceoftwosystemsforautomatedinsulindeliveryinadultswithtype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT erminabach longtermperformanceoftwosystemsforautomatedinsulindeliveryinadultswithtype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT bomartinbibby longtermperformanceoftwosystemsforautomatedinsulindeliveryinadultswithtype1diabetesanobservationalstudy
AT klavswurglerhansen longtermperformanceoftwosystemsforautomatedinsulindeliveryinadultswithtype1diabetesanobservationalstudy